| 利用方差分量估计的地震同震滑动分布反演 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 许才军, 邓长勇, 周力璇. 利用方差分量估计的地震同震滑动分布反演[J]. 武汉大学学报 ( 信息科学版), 2016, 41(1): 37-44. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20150500 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 许才军 邓长勇 周力璇 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1.武汉大学测绘学院, 湖北 武汉, 430079;;2.地球空间环境与大地测量教育部重点实验室, 湖北 武汉, 430079;;3.地球空间信息技术协同创新中心, 湖北 武汉, 430079 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学基金重点项目(41431069);地震行业科研专项基金(201308009);国家自然科学基金(41274030);国家973计划(2013CB733303)。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 提出了基于方差分量估计的地震同震滑动分布反演方法,该方法不仅可以确定不同数据集的相对权重,而且还能得到平滑因子的值,突破了方差分量估计方法仅用于各类数据定权的实际应用范围。模拟算例验证了此方法的有效性,从解的概率后验密度分布分析来看,方差分量估计方法得到的结果是线性和非线性混合方法反演结果的一个解。用方差分量估计方法反演了Bam地震同震滑动分布,并与线性非线性混合方法反演的结果进行了对比分析。两种方法得到的Bam地震断层滑动分布之间的空间互相关系数为0.999 9,地震同震的最大滑动量相同,都为3.04 m;其深度仅有微小区别,前者为4.50 km,后者为4.47 km;平均滑动量前者为0.714 m,后者为0.718 m。但前者反演计算用时227 s,后者却达到1.5×106 s,约17 d,前者仅为后者的1/6 608。结果表明,本文方法相对于线性和非线性混合方法具有计算简单、计算量小和计算效率高的优点。
|
| 关 键 词： | 方差分量估计 线性非线性反演方法 同震滑动分布 反演 同震形变 |
| 收稿时间： | 2015-08-14 |
Coseismic Slip Distribution Inversion Method Based on the Variance Component Estimation |
| |
| XU Caijun, DENG Changyong, ZHOU Lixuan. Coseismic Slip Distribution Inversion Method Based on the Variance Component Estimation[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2016, 41(1): 37-44. DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20150500 |
| |
| Authors: | XU Caijun DENG Changyong ZHOU Lixuan |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1.School of Geodesy and Geomatics, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China;;2.Key Laboratory of Geospace Environment and Geodesy, Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430079, China;;3.Collaborative Innovation Center of Geospatial Technology, Wuhan 430079, China |
| |
| Abstract: | We propose a coseismic slip distribution inversion method based on variance component estimation (VCE), this method not only determines the weight of different data sets but also can get the smoothing factor value. To illustrate and validate this inversion method, we conducted inversions on synthetic data sets. Based on the Bayesian framework and according to the posterior probability density distribution of the unknown parameters, the proposed solution is comparted to one of the linear-non-linear inversion solutions to further demonstrate the use of the proposed method. We conduct inversions on the 2003 Bam earthquake with the proposed method and linear-non-linear inversion method, the spatial cross correlation of the resulting slip distribution was about 0.999, the depth of the max slip of the both were 3.04 m and the depth had little difference, the former was 4.50 km, the latter was 4.47 km. The mean slip in the former was 0.714 m, the latter was 0.718 m. But the inversion time of the former was 227 s, and only about 1/8 000 of the later (reaching 1.5×106 s, about 17 d).These results show that the VCE method is effective and faster than the linear-non-linear inversion method. |
| |
| Keywords: | variance component estimation linear-non-linear inversion method coseismic slip distribution inversion coseismic displacement |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《武汉大学学报(信息科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《武汉大学学报(信息科学版)》下载全文 |
|
