首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

利用改进的Loheide方法计算地下水的蒸散发量
引用本文:贾伍慧,尹立河,王晓勇,张俊,贺帅军,徐丹丹,张燕. 利用改进的Loheide方法计算地下水的蒸散发量[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2017, 0(2): 48-51
作者姓名:贾伍慧  尹立河  王晓勇  张俊  贺帅军  徐丹丹  张燕
作者单位:1.中国地质大学(北京)水资源与环境学院,北京100083;2.中国地质调查局西安地质调查中心,陕西 西安710054; 3. 长安大学环境科学与工程学院,陕西 西安710064
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(41472228);中国地质调查局项目(121201011000150020)
摘    要:在干旱—半干旱地区,地下水的蒸散发是最重要的排泄方式之一,提高其计算精度对准确评价地下水资源具有重要意义。目前在已有的利用地下水水位的昼夜波动计算蒸散发的方法中,Loheide方法是计算精度最高并可以计算小时尺度的方法。针对该方法对水位去趋势化的不足,提出了新的潜水位去趋势的方法,即对3~5天的地下水位采用线性或三次多项式去趋势。采用数值模拟方法,对改进效果进行定量评估。结果表明,当相邻两天的水位变化较大时,提出的去趋势化方法使得蒸散发的计算精度有所提高,其中三次多项式去趋势化方法精度最高,比传统方法精度提高了16%,并且相对于Loheide利用1天数据线性去趋势化的方法,3~5天长序列去趋势能够提高去趋势处理的计算效率。

关 键 词:蒸散发   地下水   昼夜波动   Loheide   改进
收稿时间:2016-10-08
修稿时间:2017-01-08

Quantifying groundwater evapotranspiration by the modified loheide method
JIA Wuhui,YIN Lihe,WANG Xiaoyong,ZHANG Jun,HE Shuaijun,XU Dandan,ZHANG Yan. Quantifying groundwater evapotranspiration by the modified loheide method[J]. Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology, 2017, 0(2): 48-51
Authors:JIA Wuhui  YIN Lihe  WANG Xiaoyong  ZHANG Jun  HE Shuaijun  XU Dandan  ZHANG Yan
Affiliation:1.School of Water Resources & Environment, China University of Geosciences, Beijing100083, China; 2.Xi′an Center of China Geological Survey, Xi′an, Shaanxi710054 China; 3.School of Environmental Sciences & Engineer, Chang’an University, Xi′an, Shaanxi710064 China
Abstract:In arid and semi-arid regions, groundwater evapotranspiration is one of the main discharges, therefore the accurate estimation of evapotranspiration is significant to groundwater resources assessments. The Loheide method is currently the most accurate method to estimate hourly groundwater evapotranspiration using diurnal water table fluctuations. Aiming to improve the detrend procedure, the linear and cubic polynomial detrend method were proposed to detrend water table data over 3~5 days. The performance of the modification was assessed quantitatively using a model. The results indicate that the linear and cubic polynomial detrend method improve the estimation to some extent for the cases that water table varies dramatically. The best method is the cubic polynomial detrend method that increases the estimation by 16% in comparison to the original detrend method. Compared to the method which uses one-day water table data to get the detrend fluctuation, the modified method also is characterized by the enhancement of the detrend efficiency.
Keywords:
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《水文地质工程地质》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《水文地质工程地质》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号