| 不同方法在湖南省早稻产量动态预报中的比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 帅细强,陆魁东,黄晚华. 不同方法在湖南省早稻产量动态预报中的比较[J]. 应用气象学报, 2015, 26(1): 103-111. DOI: 10.11898/1001-7313.20150111 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 帅细强 陆魁东 黄晚华 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1.湖南省气象科学研究所，长沙 410118 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 资助项目：公益性行业（气象）科研专项（GYHY201206022，GYHY201206020），湖南省气象局重大项目“现代农业气象业务服务综合平台研究 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 为了提高产量趋势预报的准确性和定量预报的准确率，利用1962—2002年气象、早稻产量和田间观测资料，建立基于气候适宜度、关键气象因子、作物生长模型的湖南省早稻产量动态预报方法，进行回代检验；并利用2003—2012年资料进行预报检验。分析表明:3种方法的预报准确率比较接近，平均在93.8%以上；基于气候适宜度预报方法的趋势预报准确性最高，较基于关键气象因子的预报方法高4%~6%；基于作物生长模型预报方法的误差5%以内样本百分率最高，较基于气候适宜度的预报方法高2%~20%。研究结果为湖南省早稻产量动态预报筛选出了较优的方法，即产量趋势预报选用基于气候适宜度的方法，定量预报选用基于作物生长模型的方法，同时可供我国其他早稻区的产量动态预报方法研究借鉴。
|
| 关 键 词： | 气候适宜度 关键气象因子 作物生长模型 产量预报方法 |
| 收稿时间： | 2014-05-13 |
A Comparative Study on Dynamic Forecasting of Early Rice Yield by Using Different Methods in Hunan Province |
| |
| Shuai Xiqiang,Lu Kuidong and Huang Wanhua. A Comparative Study on Dynamic Forecasting of Early Rice Yield by Using Different Methods in Hunan Province[J]. Journal of Applied Meteorological Science, 2015, 26(1): 103-111. DOI: 10.11898/1001-7313.20150111 |
| |
| Authors: | Shuai Xiqiang Lu Kuidong Huang Wanhua |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1.Meteorological Science Institute of Hunan Province, Changsha 4101182.Key Lab of Hunan Province for Meteorological Disaster Prevention and Mitigation, Changsha 410118 |
| |
| Abstract: | The crop yield forecasting is one of the most important aspects of meteorological services for agricultural production. In order to improve the prediction accuracy, different forecasting methods are compared, and dynamic forecasting models of early rice yield are established based on climatic suitability, key meteorological factors and crop growth simulation model. Daily mean,maximum and minimum temperatures, precipitation, sunshine duration, wind velocity and vapor pressure data of 15 representative meteorological stations are used, as well as the early rice growth and yield data of 12 representative agricultural meteorological stations in Hunan Province from 1962 to 2002. Fitting test is performed by constraining the margin of error less than 5%. Extrapolation test is performed using data from 2003 to 2012, showing the accuracy of three methods are similar, all higher than 93.8%, and the dynamic forecasting models practically pass the test of 0.02 level, except for failing the test of 0.10 level on 30 April. Forecasting models from rifeness tiller to elongating stage pass the test of 0.01 level, and forecasting models at reproductive stage pass the test of 0.001 level too. The method based on climatic suitability improves the accuracy by 4%-6% comparing to that based on key meteorological factors and is 8%-10% more accurate than that based on crop growth simulation model. In quantitative forecast, the method based on crop growth simulation model is optimum, leading to obviously more samples whose margin of error is less than 5%. According to the analysis, the better method of early rice yield forecasting is screened out for Hunan Province. The method based on climatic suitability is chosen to carry out trend prediction of early rice yield, and the method based on crop growth simulation model is used to make quantitative forecast. It also provides reference for dynamic forecasting method research of early rice yield in other areas of China. |
| |
| Keywords: | climatic suitability key meteorological factor crop growth simulation model yield forecasting method |
|
| 点击此处可从《应用气象学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《应用气象学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
