Detrital thermochronologic record of burial heating and sediment recycling in the Magallanes foreland basin,Patagonian Andes |
| |
| Authors: | Julie C. Fosdick Marty Grove Stephan A. Graham Jeremy K. Hourigan Oscar Lovera Brian W. Romans |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Geological Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA;2. Geological & Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA;3. Earth Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA;4. Earth & Space Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA;5. Geosciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA |
| |
| Abstract: | The Patagonian Magallanes retroarc foreland basin affords an excellent case study of sediment burial recycling within a thrust belt setting. We report combined detrital zircon U–Pb geochronology and (U–Th)/He thermochronology data and thermal modelling results that confirm delivery of both rapidly cooled, first‐cycle volcanogenic sediments from the Patagonian magmatic arc and recycled sediment from deeply buried and exhumed Cretaceous foredeep strata to the Cenozoic depocentre of the Patagonian Magallanes basin. We have quantified the magnitude of Eocene heating with thermal models that simultaneously forward model detrital zircon (U–Th)/He dates for best‐fit thermal histories. Our results indicate that 54–45 Ma burial of the Maastrichtian Dorotea Formation produced 164–180 °C conditions and heating to within the zircon He partial retention zone. Such deep burial is unusual for Andean foreland basins and may have resulted from combined effects of high basal heat flow and high sediment accumulation within a rapidly subsiding foredeep that was floored by basement weakened by previous Late Jurassic rifting. In this interpretation, Cenozoic thrust‐related deformation deeply eroded the Dorotea Formation from ca. 5 km burial depths and may be responsible for the development of a basin‐wide Palaeogene unconformity. Results from the Cenozoic Río Turbio and Santa Cruz formations confirm that they contain both Cenozoic first‐cycle zircon from the Patagonian magmatic arc and highly outgassed zircon recycled from older basin strata that experienced burial histories similar to those of the Dorotea Formation. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
