满都拉—卡楚加的长剖面地壳介质密度分布及深部结构特征探榷

王谦身, 滕吉文, 陈石, 文武, 徐伟民. 2023. 满都拉—卡楚加的长剖面地壳介质密度分布及深部结构特征探榷. 地球物理学报, 66(1): 173-182, doi: 10.6038/cjg2022P0974
引用本文: 王谦身, 滕吉文, 陈石, 文武, 徐伟民. 2023. 满都拉—卡楚加的长剖面地壳介质密度分布及深部结构特征探榷. 地球物理学报, 66(1): 173-182, doi: 10.6038/cjg2022P0974
WANG QianShen, TENG JiWen, CHEN Shi, WEN Wu, XU WeiMin. 2023. Discussion on the crustal density distribution and deep crustal structure of the super-long profile from Mandula (Inner Mongolia) to Kachujia (Russia). Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 66(1): 173-182, doi: 10.6038/cjg2022P0974
Citation: WANG QianShen, TENG JiWen, CHEN Shi, WEN Wu, XU WeiMin. 2023. Discussion on the crustal density distribution and deep crustal structure of the super-long profile from Mandula (Inner Mongolia) to Kachujia (Russia). Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 66(1): 173-182, doi: 10.6038/cjg2022P0974

满都拉—卡楚加的长剖面地壳介质密度分布及深部结构特征探榷

  • 基金项目:

    国家自然科学基金项目(90914012, 41674102)资助

详细信息
    作者简介:

    王谦身, 男, 1933年生, 研究员, 长期从事固体地球物理重力学研究.E-mail: qswang@mail.iggcas.ac.cn

  • 中图分类号: P318

Discussion on the crustal density distribution and deep crustal structure of the super-long profile from Mandula (Inner Mongolia) to Kachujia (Russia)

  • 通过对南起中国内蒙古满都拉、向北经蒙古国、直抵北端俄罗斯贝加尔湖北卡楚加全长1320km长重力剖面的布格重力异常数据进行处理和解析, 依其构建了沿剖面的二维地壳密度结构模型, 并详细分析了沿剖面的地壳底界面(Moho界面)展布的深部构造特征, 及剖面辖域内的5个次级局部构造单元的重力异常场、地壳密度结构、界面起伏及断裂构造分布的特征.期望此研究结果能为该剖面跨越的中亚造山带东部地区的地壳结构、各次级构造单元的界域与关联方面的进一步研究提供相关的重力场依据.

  • 加载中
  • 图 1 

    中亚造山带大地构造位置图(肖文交等, 2019)

    Figure 1. 

    Tectonic map of central Asian orogenic belt (Xiao, et al., 2019)

    图 2 

    满都拉—卡楚加重力剖面地形与地理位置图

    Figure 2. 

    Mandula-Kachujia gravity profile and its surrounding topography relief

    图 3 

    满都拉—卡楚加剖面的地形高程分布(a)与布格重力异常(b)图

    Figure 3. 

    Mandula-Kachujia terrain elevation (a) and Bouguer gravity anomaly (b) map

    图 4 

    满都拉—卡楚加(重力)地学剖面的地壳密度结构

    Figure 4. 

    Mandula- Kachujia Bouguer gravity anomaly (a) and crustal density structure (b)

    图 5 

    贝加尔裂谷湖模型

    Figure 5. 

    Baikal rift lake model

    图 6 

    贝加尔裂谷湖辖域地壳底部Moho面隆起模型

    Figure 6. 

    Moho surface uplift model of Baikal rift lake region

    表 1 

    贝加尔裂谷带域

    Table 1. 

    Baikal rift region

    带域南侧 哈马尔达班山脉 湖南岸侧 湖心 湖北岸侧
    51.7°N(255 km) 51.9°N(238 km) 52.05°N(224 km) 52.42°N(176 km) 52.75°N(140 km)
    海拔高程/m 1000 1200 1010 400 900
    布格重力异常值/mGal -92 -117 -103 -193 -89
    Moho界面深度/km 40.15 40 39.6 38.3 39.0
    注:()内的km数值为该点距剖面北端点卡楚加(0 km)的距离(下同).
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2 

    肯特山造山带域

    Table 2. 

    Kentai orogenic belt region

    带域南侧蒙古—鄂霍茨克缝合线处 肯特山脉最高处 肯特山脉北麓
    47.6°N(709 km) 48.66°N(607 km) 49.67°N(501 km)
    海拔高程/m 1200 2100 1010
    布格重力异常值/mGal -168 -219 -140
    Moho界面深度/km 43.0 46.1 42.6
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3 

    蒙古主缝合线响应带域

    Table 3. 

    Mongolian main suture region

    带域南界 带域中部 带域北界
    45.3°N(988 km) 45.65°N(950 km) 45.9°N(918 km)
    海拔高程/m 1063 1200 1255
    布格重力异常值/mGal -139 -166 -147.6
    Moho界面深度/km 41.1 41.5 41.8
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 4 

    地壳底部Moho界面断开带域

    Table 4. 

    Lower crustal Moho surface fault zone

    带域南侧 带域中部 带域北侧
    44.1°N(1125 km) 44.36°N(1095 km) 44.62°N(1065 km)
    海拔高程/m 808 915 1190
    布格重力异常值/mGal -116 -142 -128
    Moho界面深度/km 38.6 38 40.6
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 5 

    内蒙古索伦缝合线响应带域

    Table 5. 

    Inner Mongolia Solun main suture zone

    带域南界 带域中部 带域北界
    42.9°N(1245 km) 43.16°N(1234 km) 43.42°N(1215 km)
    海拔高程/m 1302 1229 999
    布格重力异常值/mGal -144 -172 -136
    Moho界面深度/km 42.5 42.4 42.0
    下载: 导出CSV
  •  

    Badarcha G, Cunninghamb W D, Windleyb B F. 2002. A new terrane subdivision for Mongolia: implications for the Phanerozoic crustal growth of Central Asia. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 21(1): 87-110. doi: 10.1016/S1367-9120(02)00017-2

     

    Brocher T M. 2005. Empirical Relations between Elastic Wavespeeds and Density in the Earth′s Crust. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 95(6): 2081-2092. doi: 10.1785/0120050077

     

    Chen S, Wang Q S. 2015. Gravity anomalies and the distributions of inhomogeneous masses in the crust of Mongolia and its surrounding regions. Chinese Journal of Geophysics(in Chinese), 58(1): 79-91, doi: 10.6038/cjg20150107.

     

    Cherepanova Y, Artemieva I M, Thybo H, et al. 2013. Crustal structure of the Siberian craton and the West Siberian basin: An appraisal of existing seismic data. Tectonophysics, 609: 154-183. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2013.05.004

     

    He J, Wu Q J, Gao M T, et al. 2014. Crustal structure and Poisson ratio beneath the central and southern Mongolia derived from receiver functions. Chinese Journal of Geophysics(in Chinese), 57(7): 2386-2394, doi: 10.6038/cjg20140732.

     

    He J, Wu Q J, Zhang R Q, et al. 2018. Crustal structure beneath the Abaga area of Xing′an-Mongolia Orogenic Belt using teleseismic receiver functions. Chinese Journal of Geophysics(in Chinese), 61(9): 3676-3688, doi: 10.6038/cjg2018M0013.

     

    Huang J X, Zhao Z D, Zhang H F, et al. 2006. Elemental and Sr- Nd-Pb isotopic geochemistry of the Wenduermiao and Bayanaobao-Jiaoqier ophiolites, Inner Mongolia: Constraints for the characteristics of the mantle domain of eastern Paleo-Asian Ocean. Acta Petrologica Sinica (in Chinese), 22(12): 2889-2900.

     

    Jiang X D, Li D Y, Gong W, et al. 2014. Differential deformation and uplift mechanisms of the eastern and western Tibetan plateau. Chinese Journal of Geophysics(in Chinese), 57(12): 4016-4028, doi: 10.6038/cjg20141214.

     

    Kearey P, Klepeis K A, Vine F J. 2009. Global Tectonics. 3rd ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

     

    Ludwig W J, Nafe J E, Drake C L. 1970. Seismic refraction. Maxwell A E ed. The Sea, Vol. 4. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 53-84.

     

    Olsen K H. 1995. Continental Rifts: Evolution, Structure, Tectonics. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

     

    Qiang Z Y, Wu Q J, Li Y H, et al. 2016. Crustal anisotropy beneath central-south Mongolia and its dynamic implications. Chinese Journal of Geophysics(in Chinese), 59(5), doi: 10.6038/cjg20160507.

     

    ten Brink U S, Taylor M H. 2002. Crustal structure of central Lake Baikal: Insights into intracontinental rifting. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 107(B7): ETG 2-1-ETG 2-15. doi: 10.1029/2001JB000300

     

    Teng J, Deng Y, Badal J, et al. 2014. Moho depth, seismicity and seismogenic structure in China mainland. Tectonophysics, 627: 108-121. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2013.11.008

     

    Teng J, Zeng R, Yan Y, et al. 2003. Depth distribution of Moho and tectonic framework in eastern Asian continent and its adjacent ocean areas. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences, 46(5): 428-446. doi: 10.1360/03yd9038

     

    Teng J W, Ma X Y, Zhang X M, et al. 2017. Deep processes and dynamic responses of the generation and occurrence of the 2015 Nepal MS8.1 earthquake. Chinese Journal of Geophysics(in Chinese), 60(1): 123-141, doi: 10.6038/cjg20170111.

     

    Wang Q S, An Y L, Zhang C J, et al. 2003. Gravitology (in Chinese). Beijing: Seismological Press, 2003.

     

    Wang Q S, Teng J W, Zhang Y Q, et al. 2017. Discussion on the crustal density distribution and deep crustal structure of the super-long profile from Mandula (Inner Mongolia) to Pingxiang (Guangxi). Chinese Journal of Geophysics(in Chinese), 60(12): 4681-4698, doi: 10.6038/cjg20171212.

     

    Wang Q S, Teng J W, Zhang Y Q, et al. 2016. Discussion on the gravity anomaly and deep crustal structure of an 1800 km long profile crossing Shaanxi, Chongqing, Guizhou and Guangxi. Chinese Journal of Geophysics(in Chinese), 59(11): 4139-4152, doi: 10.6038/cjg20161117.

     

    Wang Q S, Teng J W, Zhang Y Q, et al. 2015. Gravity anomalies and deep crustal structure of the Ordos basin—middle Qinling orogen—eastern Sichuan basin. Chinese Journal of Geophysics(in Chinese), 58(2): 532-541, doi: 10.6038/cjg20150216.

     

    Windley B F, Alexeiev D, Xiao W, et al. 2007. Tectonic models for accretion of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt. Journal of the Geological Society, 164(1): 31-47. doi: 10.1144/0016-76492006-022

     

    Xiao W J, Song D F, Windley B F, et al. 2019. Research progresses of the accretionary processes and metallogenesis of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt. Science China Earth Sciences, 49(10): 1512-1545.

     

    Xiao W, Windley B F, Hao J, et al. 2003. Accretion leading to collision and the Permian Solonker suture, Inner Mongolia, China: Termination of the central Asian orogenic belt. Tectonics, 22(6): 1069.

     

    陈石, 王谦身. 2015. 蒙古及周边地区重力异常和地壳不均匀体分布. 地球物理学报, 58(1): 79-91, doi: 10.6038/cjg20150107. http://www.geophy.cn/article/doi/10.6038/cjg20150107

     

    何静, 吴庆举, 高孟潭等. 2014. 利用接收函数方法研究蒙古中南部地区地壳结构. 地球物理学报, 57(7): 2386-2394, doi: 10.6038/cjg20140732. http://www.geophy.cn/article/doi/10.6038/cjg20140732

     

    何静, 吴庆举, 张瑞青等. 2018. 利用接收函数研究兴蒙造山带阿巴嘎地区的地壳结构. 地球物理学报, 61(9): 3676-3688, doi: 10.6038/cjg2018M0013. http://www.geophy.cn/article/doi/10.6038/cjg2018M0013

     

    黄金香, 赵志丹, 张宏飞等. 2006. 内蒙古温都尔庙和巴彦敖包-交其尔蛇绿岩的元素与同位素地球化学: 对古亚洲洋东部地幔域特征的限制. 岩石学报, 22(12): 2889-2900. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200612006.htm

     

    姜效典, 李德勇, 宫伟等. 2014. 青藏高原东西向差异形变与隆升机制. 地球物理学报, 57(12): 4016-4028, doi: 10.6038/cjg20141214. http://www.geophy.cn/article/doi/10.6038/cjg20141214

     

    强正阳, 吴庆举, 李永华等. 2016. 蒙古中南部地区地壳各向异性及其动力学意义. 地球物理学报, 59(5): 1616-1628, doi: 10.6038/cjg20160507. http://www.geophy.cn/article/doi/10.6038/cjg20160507

     

    滕吉文, 马学英, 张雪梅等. 2017. 2015年尼泊尔MS8.1大地震孕育的深层过程与发生的动力学响应. 地球物理学报, 60(1): 123-141, doi: 10.6038/cjg20170111.

     

    王谦身, 安玉林, 张赤军等. 2003. 重力学. 北京: 地震出版社.

     

    王谦身, 滕吉文, 张永谦等. 2016. 陕渝黔桂1800 km超长探测剖面重力异常场特征及深部地壳结构探榷. 地球物理学报, 59(11): 4139-4152, doi: 10.6038/cjg20161117. http://www.geophy.cn/article/doi/10.6038/cjg20161117

     

    王谦身, 滕吉文, 张永谦等. 2017. 内蒙满都拉—广西凭祥超长剖面地壳介质密度分布及深部结构特征探榷. 地球物理学报, 60(12): 4681-4698, doi: 10.6038/cjg20171212. http://www.geophy.cn/article/doi/10.6038/cjg20171212

     

    王谦身, 滕吉文, 张永谦等. 2015. 鄂尔多斯—中秦岭—四川东部的重力异常场与深部地壳结构. 地球物理学报, 58(2): 532-541, doi: 10.6038/cjg20150216. http://www.geophy.cn/article/doi/10.6038/cjg20150216

     

    肖文交, 宋东方, WINDLEY B F等. 2019. 中亚增生造山过程与成矿作用研究进展. 中国科学: 地球科学, 49(10): 1512-1545. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK201910003.htm

  • 加载中

(6)

(5)

计量
  • 文章访问数: 
  • PDF下载数: 
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2021-12-07
修回日期:  2022-11-10
上线日期:  2023-01-10

目录