2003年青海德令哈6.7级地震序列的震源机制解及其构造含义

孙长虹, 许丰, 杨玉波, 钱荣毅, 孟小红. 2003年青海德令哈6.7级地震序列的震源机制解及其构造含义[J]. 地球物理学报, 2012, 55(10): 3338-3346, doi: 10.6038/j.issn.0001-5733.2012.10.016
引用本文: 孙长虹, 许丰, 杨玉波, 钱荣毅, 孟小红. 2003年青海德令哈6.7级地震序列的震源机制解及其构造含义[J]. 地球物理学报, 2012, 55(10): 3338-3346, doi: 10.6038/j.issn.0001-5733.2012.10.016
SUN Chang-Hong, XU Feng, YANG Yu-Bo, QIAN Rong-Yi, MENG Xiao-Hong. Focal mechanism solutions of 2003 Delingha,Qinghai, M6.7 earthquake sequence and its tectonic implication[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 2012, 55(10): 3338-3346, doi: 10.6038/j.issn.0001-5733.2012.10.016
Citation: SUN Chang-Hong, XU Feng, YANG Yu-Bo, QIAN Rong-Yi, MENG Xiao-Hong. Focal mechanism solutions of 2003 Delingha,Qinghai, M6.7 earthquake sequence and its tectonic implication[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 2012, 55(10): 3338-3346, doi: 10.6038/j.issn.0001-5733.2012.10.016

2003年青海德令哈6.7级地震序列的震源机制解及其构造含义

详细信息
  • 中图分类号: P315

Focal mechanism solutions of 2003 Delingha,Qinghai, M6.7 earthquake sequence and its tectonic implication

  • 利用8个流动数字地震台和国家数字地震台站的地震波形记录,测量了2003年4月17日青海德令哈6.7级地震及其主要余震的直达P波、SV波、SH波的初动方向和振幅比,应用Snoke(2003)的测定震源机制解的格点尝试法,测定出德令哈地震序列的48个2.4级以上地震的震源机制解.搜集分析了美国哈佛大学测定的德令哈6.7级主震和2004年二期地震活动中的7个地震的震源机制解.基于余震空间分布特征和对震源机制解特征的分析,讨论了德令哈地震序列的可能断层活动方式和地震的构造含义.结果表明,主震和大部分余震都是沿NWW-SEE走向的逆断层错动,北边的上盘可能沿低角度向北倾的断层面向南仰冲;个别正断层余震可能是震源区挤压变形弧顶区附近发生的局部张性破裂;在二期地震活动中,逆断层和走滑断层都有,走滑断层地震主要发生在震源区东侧.德令哈地震活动是青藏高原东北缘NWW-SEE向延伸的挤压带继续处于隆升活动中的表现,这一继承性新构造运动是德令哈地震序列的可能发震原因.
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    叶建青, 沈军, 汪一鹏等. 柴达木盆地北缘的活动构造. //活动断裂研究——理论与应用. 北京: 地震出版社, 1996: 172-179. Ye J Q, Shen J, Wang Y P, et al. The northeastern marginal active tectonics of Qaidam basin. //Research on Active Faults (in Chinese). Beijing: Seismological Press, 1996: 172-179.

    [2]

    吕坚, 郑勇, 倪四道等. 2005年11月26日九江-瑞昌Ms5.7、Ms4.8地震的震源机制解与发震构造研究. 地球物理学报, 2008, 51(1): 162-168. Lü J, Zheng Y, Ni S D, et al. Focal mechanism and seismogenic structures of the Ms5.7 and Ms4.8 Jiujiang-Ruichang earthquakes of Nov. 26, 2005. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 2008, 51(1): 162-168.

    [3]

    郑勇, 马宏生, 吕坚. 汶川地震强余震(Ms≥5. 6)的震源机制解及其与发震构造的关系. 中国科学(D辑), 2009, (4): 23-36. Zheng Y, Ma H S, Lü J. Focal mechanism solutions of Ms≥5.6 aftershocks of the Wenchuan earthquake and their relation with seismogenic structure. Science in China (Series D) (in Chinese), 2009, (4): 23-36.

    [4]

    龙思胜. 2001年四川雅江6. 0级地震序列的破裂特征及发震构造. 中国地震, 2004, 20(1): 1-11. Long S S. Fracture characters and statutory of the Yajiang earthquake sequence with Ms 6.0 in the Sichuan region in 2001. Earthquake Research in China (in Chinese), 2004, 20(1): 1-11.

    [5]

    Ratchkovski N A, Wiemer S, Hansen R A. Seismotectonics of the Central Denali Fault, Alaska, and the 2002 Denali Fault earthquake sequence. Bull. Seis. Soc. Am., 2004, 94(6B): S156-S174.

    [6]

    Waldhauser F. HypoDD-A program to compute double-difference hypocenter locations. U. S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 01-113,2001.

    [7]

    孙长虹, 钱荣毅, 肖国林等. 2003年青海德令哈6. 7级地震序列的重新定位和发震构造. 物探与化探, 2006, 30(1): 79-82. Sun C H, Qian R Y, Xiao G L, et al. The relocation and seismogenic structure of the Delingha earthquake sequence of 2003 in Qinghai. Geophys. Geochem. Explor. (in Chinese), 2006, 30(1): 79-82.

    [8]

    Rivers W, Wagner R. Geotool Version 4.0.0 Manual, 2005.

    [9]

    Snoke J A. CLYDE and the Gopher: a preliminary analysis of the 12 May 1990 Sakhalin Island event. Seism. Res. Lett., 1990, 61(3-4): 161.

    [10]

    Snoke J A. 2003, FOCMEC: FOCal MEChanism Determinations. http://www.geol.vt.edu/outreach/vtso/focmec/.

    [11]

    孙长虹, 蔡德超, 钱荣毅等. Snoke震源机制求解方法应用研究. 地震地磁观测与研究, 2010, 31(4): 7-13. Sun C H, Cai D C, Qian R Y, et al. An application of Snoke's algorithm for focal mechanism determination. Seismol. Geomagnetic Obs. Res. (in Chinese), 2010, 31(4): 7-13.

    [12]

    俞春泉, 陶开, 崔效锋等. 用格点尝试法求解P波初动震源机制解及解的质量评价. 地球物理学报, 2009, 52(5): 1402-1411. Yu C Q, Tao K, Cui X F, et al. P-wave first-motion focal mechanism solutions and their quality evaluation. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 2009, 52(5): 1402-1411.

    [13]

    许忠淮. 东亚地区现今构造应力图的编制. 地震学报, 2001, 23(5): 490-500. Xu Z H. A present-day tectonic stress map for eastern Asia region. Acta Seismologica Sinica (in Chinese), 2001, 23(5): 490-500.

    [14]

    万永革, 沈正康, 刁桂苓等. 利用小震分布和区域应力场确定大震断层面参数方法及其在唐山地震序列中的应用. 地球物理学报, 2008, 51(3): 793-804. Wan Y G, Shen Z K, Diao G L, et al. An algorithm of fault parameter determination using distribution of small earthquakes and parameters of regional stress field and its application to Tangshan earthquake sequence. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 2008, 51(3): 793-804.

    [15]

    许忠淮, 汪素云, 黄雨蕊等. 由多个小震推断的青甘和川滇地区地壳应力场的方向特征. 地球物理学报, 1987, 30(5): 476-486. Xu Z H, Wang S Y, Huang Y R, et al. Directions of mean stress axes in southwestern China deduced from microearthquake data. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 1987, 30(5): 476-486.

    [16]

    Wan Y G. Comtemporary tectonic stress field in China. Earthquake Science, 2010, 23(4): 377-386.

    [17]

    陈顒. 地壳岩石的力学性能. 北京: 地震出版社, 1988. Chen Y. Mechanic Property of Crustal Rocks (in Chinese). Beijing: Seismological Press, 1988.

    [18]

    虢顺民, 江在森, 张崇立. 青藏高原东北缘晚第四纪块体划分与运动态势研究. 地震地质, 2000, 22(3): 219-231. Guo S M, Jiang Z S, Zhang S L. Division and motion status of blocks for northeastern Tibetan plateau in late Quternary. Seismology and Geology (in Chinese), 2000, 22(3): 219-231.

  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数: 
  • PDF下载数: 
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2011-12-24
修回日期:  2012-09-19
上线日期:  2012-10-20

目录