真空联合堆载预压近海软基加固效果分析
An analysis of the effect of vacuum combined with surcharge preloading on offshore soft foundation reinforcement
-
摘要: 根据舟山近海软基处理的监测数据,详细分析了地表沉降、分层沉降、孔隙水压力及土体水平位移等变化规律。分析表明:6 m以下土层预压后单位土体的压缩量较大,与该土体土质和预压前土层未被压缩有关;每级堆载的施加使孔压相应增加,但因真空预压占主导地位加之孔压的转化,使孔压仍呈下降趋势,且产生的联合超静孔压始终小于0, 说明采用真空联合堆载预压加固软基过程中,抽真空形成一定的负超静孔压后,快速堆载不会出现地基失稳现象;一定深度下土体水平位移由收缩变为向外挤出,是因井阻使真空度沿深度衰减较大,产生的真空吸力小于堆载产生的向外的附加应力。真空联合堆载预压的有效影响深度可达塑料排水板以下4 m。Abstract: Based on the monitoring data of the Zhoushan coastal soft soil foundation treatment, the surface settlement, layered settlement, pore water pressure and horizontal displacement of soil are analyzed in detail. The results show that the compressive capacity of soil mass in the soil below the depth of 6 m is larger after preloading, which is related to the soil quality and uncompress of the soil layer before preloading. Pore pressure increases with the increasing stack load series. Since the vacuum preloading dominates the main position and pore pressure is transformed, the pore pressure has a downward trend, and the resulting joint super static pore pressure is always less than 0, indicating that the vacuum combined surcharge preloading method can reinforce the soft foundation, the vacuum forms a certain negative pressure after the pore pressure, and the fast reactor load will not appear the phenomenon of foundation instability. The horizontal displacement of soil is converted from shrinkage to squeeze out under a certain depth. Reason for the above phenomenon is that the vacuum degree has higher attenuation by well resistance and the vacuum suction is less than the outward additional stress of the stack load produced. The effective depth of the vacuum combined with preloading can reach 4 m below the plastic drainage board.
-
-
[1] [1]KJELLMAN W.Consolidation of clay by heart of atmosphere pressure[C]//Proceedings of the Conference on Soil Stabilization.Boston:Massachusetts Institute of Technology,1952:258-263.
[2] [2]童中,汪建斌. 软土路基真空联合堆载预压位移监测与分析[J]. 岩土力学,2002,23(5):661-666. [TONG Z, WANG J B. Monitoring and analysis of displacements of soft soil embankment with jointed vacuum-preloading treatment[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2002,23(5):661-666. (in Chinese)]
[3] [3]朱建才, 陈兰云, 龚晓南. 高等级公路桥头软基真空联合堆载预压加固试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(12):2160-2165. [ZHU J C, CHEN L Y, GONG X N. Testing study on reinforcing soft foundation of highway bridge-head by vacuum combined with surcharge preloading[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2005,24(12):2160-2165. (in Chinese)]
[4] [4]金小荣,俞建霖,龚晓南,等.含承压水软基真空联合堆载预压加固试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2007,29(5): 789-793. [JIN X R, YU J L, GONG X N, et al. Field tests on soft soil with confined underground water by vacuum-surcharge preloading[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2007,29(5):789-793.(in Chinese)]
[5] [5]张仪萍,严露,俞亚南,等.真空预压加固软土地基变形与固结计算研究[J]. 岩土力学,2011,32(增刊1):149-154. [ZHANG Y P, YAN L, YU Y N, et al. Solutions for settlement and consolidation of soft ground with vacuum preloading[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2011,32(Sup 1):149-154. (in Chinese)]
[6] [6]彭劼,何钜,张文彬,等. 真空-堆载联合预压处理地基的沉降特性[J]. 河海大学学报(自然科学版),2012, 40(6):670-675. [PENG J,HE J,ZHANG W B,et al. Ground settlement characteristics undervacuum and surcharge combined preloading[J]. Journal of Hohai University (Natural Sciences), 2012,40(6):670-675. (in Chinese)]
[7] [7]吴焕然,阎长虹,许宝田,等.真空堆载联合预压加固软土地基效果分析[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2013,40(3): 74-78. [WU H R,YAN C H,XU B T,et al. Analysis of reinforcing effect of soft clay foundation by vacuum-surcharge preloading method[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2013,40(3):74-78.(in Chinese)]
[8] [8]龚晓南.土塑性力学[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2001. [GONG X N. Soil plastic mechanics[M]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University Press,2001. (in Chinese)]
[9] [9]李时亮. 真空预压加固软土地基作用机理分析[J].岩土力学,2008,29(2): 479-482. [LI S L. Analysis of action mechanism of treating soft foundation with vacuum preloading[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2008,29(2): 479-482. (in Chinese)]
[10] [10]彭劼,刘汉龙,陈永辉. 真空-堆载联合预压法软基加固对周围环境的影响[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2002,24(5): 657-659. [PENG J, LIU H L, CHEN Y H. Effect of vacuum preloading method on boundary of consolidated soft foundation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2002,24(5):656-659.(in Chinese)]
-
期刊类型引用(13)
1. 杨磊勇. 真空联合堆载预压加固吹填土地基处理效果分析. 路基工程. 2025(01): 69-73 . 百度学术
2. 黄志华,问建学,马祖遥,唐昌意,肖景平,李松,何忠意,姜立宝. 真空联合堆载预压处理路基变形影响范围研究. 公路. 2024(03): 56-62 . 百度学术
3. 吴其长,徐方,张期树,彭扬发,韩諝,阮波,杨奇. 塑料排水板地基侧向变形的模型试验与仿真分析. 水文地质工程地质. 2024(06): 113-125 . 本站查看
4. 杨磊勇,李建中,吴丹伟. 竖井地基真空度竖向传递时间效应固结解析解. 路基工程. 2022(06): 25-28 . 百度学术
5. 徐仁宇,王俊刚,李一凡,姚鑫,王朝阳. 非饱和土在孔隙负压状态下的性能研究. 青岛理工大学学报. 2021(03): 57-62 . 百度学术
6. 师亚忠. 塑料排水板结合堆载预压软基处理沉降监测技术. 价值工程. 2020(10): 100-102 . 百度学术
7. 陈盛原,叶华洋,张伟锋,韦未. 水泥搅拌桩联合堆载排水固结法加固软基的效果评价. 科学技术与工程. 2020(14): 5743-5750 . 百度学术
8. 庞毅玲,胡岱文. PAC改进真空预压法加固软土地基试验研究. 地下空间与工程学报. 2020(05): 1391-1396 . 百度学术
9. 陈盛原,叶华洋,张伟锋,韦未. 水泥搅拌桩联合堆载固结法对海相软土不同处理方式的试验研究. 科学技术与工程. 2020(30): 12533-12539 . 百度学术
10. 问建学,丁强,陈松. FLAC3D模拟真空联合堆载预压处理软土路基变形的研究. 公路. 2018(05): 65-68 . 百度学术
11. 沈立祥,龚永康. 不同方法加固吹填淤泥的对比试验. 水运工程. 2018(05): 160-164 . 百度学术
12. 刘国祥,王松林,姜云鹏,安庆军. 真空联合堆载预压加固海相软基的环境效应研究. 水运工程. 2018(09): 177-180 . 百度学术
13. 秦皎,毕俊伟,高广运. 真空联合堆载预压法在某新近吹填场地的应用研究. 路基工程. 2018(06): 47-51 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(3)
计量
- 文章访问数: 832
- HTML全文浏览量: 40
- PDF下载量: 510
- 被引次数: 16