| 油源对比常规方法的使用误区 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 卢鸿,冯小杰.油源对比常规方法的使用误区[J].地球科学与环境学报,2000,22(2):56-59. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 卢鸿 冯小杰 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 石油大学,地科系,北京,102200 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 通过采用不同方法得出不同认识的三个实例 ,说明油气地球化学研究中较常采用的正相关系数法、分布指纹对比法以及碳同位素类型曲线法存在误区与使用不当之处 ,应该提倡采用多参数、多指标的散点图法以及多元统计分析等来进行油源综合对比
|
| 关 键 词： | 油源对比 常规方法 使用误区 相关系数法 分布指纹对比法 碳同位素类型曲线法 |
ON THE MISUNDERSTAND OF OIL-SOURCE CORRELATION METHODS |
| |
| LU Hong,FENG Xiao-jie.ON THE MISUNDERSTAND OF OIL-SOURCE CORRELATION METHODS[J].Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2000,22(2):56-59. |
| |
| Authors: | LU Hong FENG Xiao-jie |
| |
| Abstract: | The choice of oilsource correlation methods is very important to its conclusions. In this paper,as illustrated by three practical examples,different conclusions were gained by used different methods, and showed that misapprehend and misunderstand are existed in the popular used correlation coefficient analysis, distribution fingerprint correlation and distribution type of carbon isotope component in the petroleum geochemical research. As a result, it can be concluded that, multivariant statistical analysis by multiparameters and multiindexes should be advocated or promoted to strengthen the reliabilities of oilsource correlation. |
| |
| Keywords: | oilsource correlation popular method misunderstand correlation coefficient analyis distribution fingerprint correlation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
