首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

复数域总体最小二乘平差
引用本文:王乐洋,于冬冬,吕开云.复数域总体最小二乘平差[J].测绘学报,2015,44(8):866-876.
作者姓名:王乐洋  于冬冬  吕开云
作者单位:1. 东华理工大学测绘工程学院, 江西 南昌 330013;2. 江西省数字国土重点实验室, 江西 南昌 330013;3. 流域生态与地理环境监测国家测绘地理信息局重点实验室, 江西 南昌 330013
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(41204003;41304020),江西省自然科学基金(20132BAB216004),江西省教育厅科技项目(GJJ13456;KJLD14049),地理空间信息工程国家测绘地理信息局重点实验室项目(201308),测绘地理信息公益性行业科研专项(201512026),东华理工大学博士科研启动金(DHBK201113)Foundation support:The National Natural Science Foundation of China(.41204003;41304020),Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province(20132BAB216004),Science and Technology Project of the Education Department of Jiangxi Province(.GJJ13456;KJLD14049),Key Laboratory of Geo-informatics of State Bureau of Surveying and Mapping(201308),The National Department Public Benefit Research Foundation (Surverying;Mapping and Geoinfor mation)(No.201512026)Scientific Research Foundation of ECIT (No.DHBK201113).
摘    要:在复数域最小二乘的基础上提出了复数域总体最小二乘平差方法,推导了复数域总体最小二乘和复数混合总体最小二乘的相关公式。通过算例比较分析了复数观测值的残差的模的平方和最小(平差准则1)下及残差的实部和虚部的平方和分别最小(平差准则2)下的复数最小二乘、复数观测值和系数矩阵的残差的模的平方和最小(平差准则3)下及残差的实部和虚部的平方和分别最小(平差准则4)下的复数总体最小二乘方法的优劣。试验结果表明:平差准则1下复数最小二乘较平差准则2下得到的结果更加合理,平差准则3下复数总体最小二乘较平差准则4下得到的结果更为准确;当顾及系数矩阵误差时,平差准则3下复数总体最小二乘要优于平差准则1下复数最小二乘。

关 键 词:复数  总体最小二乘  混合总体最小二乘  最小二乘  平差准则  
收稿时间:2013-10-02
修稿时间:2014-12-25

Complex Total Least Squares Adjustment
WANG Leyang,YU Dongdong,L&#,Kaiyun.Complex Total Least Squares Adjustment[J].Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica,2015,44(8):866-876.
Authors:WANG Leyang  YU Dongdong  L&#  Kaiyun
Institution:1. Faculty of Geomatics, East China Institute of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China;2. Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory for Digital Land, Nanchang 330013, China;3. Key Laboratory of Watershed Ecology and Geographical Environment Monitoring, NASG, Nanchang 330013, China
Abstract:On the basis of complex least squares adjustment method (CLSAM),the theory of complex total least squares adjustment method (CTLSAM)is proposed.The algorithms of complex total least squares and complex LS-TLS method are derived.Through two examples,the complex LS method under the adjustment criterions that minimize the sum of squares of the module of observation vector residual (adjustment criterion 1)and the sum of squares of the real part and imaginary part of the observation vector (adjust-ment criterion 2),the complex TLS method under the adjustment criterions that minimize the sum of squares of the module of observation vector and coefficient matrix residual (adjustment criterion 3)and the sum of squares of the real part and imaginary part of the observation vector and coefficient matrix residual (adjustment criterion 4)are compared and analyzed respectively.The results of two examples show that the CLSAM under the adjustment criterion 1 is more reasonable than the adjustment criterion 2;the CTLSAM under the adjustment criterion 3 is more accurate than the adjustment criterion 4;the CTLSAM under the adjustment criterion 3 is better than the CLSAM under the adjustment criterion 1 when the coefficient matrix contains stochastic noise.
Keywords:complex  total least squares  mixed total least squares  least squares  adjustment criterion
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《测绘学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《测绘学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号