首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

基于GPS实测控制点的SPOT 5 1A数据几何校正方法精度比较
引用本文:陈华,安娜,杨清华.基于GPS实测控制点的SPOT 5 1A数据几何校正方法精度比较[J].国土资源遥感,2007,18(4):47-50.
作者姓名:陈华  安娜  杨清华
作者单位:中国国土资源航空物探遥感中心,北京,100083
摘    要:采用高精度的星基差分GPS实测控制点对SPOT 5 1A数据几何校正方法进行比较,对校正误差的产生原因进行分析。结果表 明,正射模型法的校正精度远高于多项式法的校正精度;多项式法在X方向上的误差远大于Y方向上的误差;正射模型法的误差在2个 方向上差别不大。卫星扫描角度引起的像元畸变是多项式方法产生较大误差的重要原因。

关 键 词:SPOT  5  GPS  几何校正  正射模型法  多项式法
文章编号:1001-070X(2007)04-0047-04
收稿时间:2007-08-20
修稿时间:2007-09-18

GEOMETRIC CORRECTION METHODS OF SPOT5 1A DATA BASED ON GPS-MEASURED GROUND CONTROL POINTS
CHEN Hua,AN Na,YANG Qing-hua.GEOMETRIC CORRECTION METHODS OF SPOT5 1A DATA BASED ON GPS-MEASURED GROUND CONTROL POINTS[J].Remote Sensing for Land & Resources,2007,18(4):47-50.
Authors:CHEN Hua  AN Na  YANG Qing-hua
Institution:China Aero Geophysical Survey and Remote Sensing Center for Land and Resources, Beijing 100083, China
Abstract:Using the high resolution ground control points measured by satellite-based DGPS (Differential Global Positioning System), this paper compared two geometric correction methods for SPOT5 data and analyzed the causes of correction errors. The results show that the accuracy of the orthorectification model method is better than that of the polynomial method. The errors of the polynomial method in Y axis are bigger than those in X axis, but the error difference in Y axis and in X axis is not obvious for the orthorectification model method. The pixel distortion caused by the satellite observation angle is the main cause for the bigger errors of the polynomial method.
Keywords:SPOT 5  GPS  Geometric correction  Orthorectification model method  Polynomial method
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《国土资源遥感》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《国土资源遥感》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号