吉林省旅游经济差异性及其空间格局研究

以吉林省9个地级市(州)为例,综合运用多种计量模型对2002—2014年吉林省旅游经济差异性以及空间格局进行深入分析,结果表明:1地带内、地带间以及总体地带旅游经济空间差异显著,且地带间差异程度呈现出由东部地带西部地带中部地带,逐渐演化为中部地带东部地带西部地带。2西部地带对地带内旅游经济差异贡献最大,但贡献程度不断变小;中部次之,但贡献程度不断变大;东部最小且贡献程度也逐渐缩小。地带内旅游经济差异对全省旅游经济差异平均贡献程度最大,但贡献率不断缩小,而地带间贡献率不断增大。3 2002—2004年以及2006—2007年吉林省东中西三大地带国内旅游经济收敛性逐渐趋同,2004—2006年中部地带与东部地带、西部地带之间的空间差异不断扩大,而2007—2014年地带之间旅游经济差异程度逐渐缩小。4吉林省旅游呈现中心—外围的空间结构,由于地理临近效应发挥,形成了四平—辽源旅游经济组团、白城—松原旅游经济组团以及通化—白山旅游经济组团。并且旅游经济联系强度具有路径依赖特征,但并不等同于路径锁定效应,区域旅游的异军突起可以形成路径创造效应。

Research on the Difference and Space Pattern of Tourism Economy in Jilin Province

The study of tourism economy can not only optimize the spatial distribution of tourism resources, but also properly deal with the relationship between competition and cooperation, and finally promote the sustained, coordinated and high quality development of tourism. Taking nine cities in Jilin Province as an example, combina-tion of Theil index, area separation coefficient, geographic concentration and tourism economic spatial linkage measure model, the thesis researched tourism economy difference and spatial pattern of Jilin Province since 2002. The results show that:1) The difference of tourism economy is significantly different, and the degree of regional differences overall present is the eastern zone>the central zone>the western zone, gradually evolved into the cen-tral zone >the eastern region >the western zone;2) As for zone tourism economic differences, the western region shows the strongest effect, but the contribution degree is decreasing, while the contribution degree of central zone becomes larger and the eastern zone gradually reduced. Area tourism economy difference makes the most contribu-tion to the province’ s tourism economic differences, but the contribution rate is shrinking, while zone between con-tribution rates has increased;3) During 2002—2004 and 2006—2007, the three zones domestic tourism gradually convergence, during 2004—2006, the spatial difference between the central zone and the east zone and the west zone is widening, but during 2007—2014, the tourism economic differences between regions reduced gradually;4) The tourism development shows core-periphery spatial structure, due to geographical approaches effects, formed three secondary tourism groups of Siping-Liaoyuan, Baicheng-Songyuan and Tonghua-Baishan. And the relationship intensity of tourism economy has the characteristics of path dependence, but do not equal to the path lock-in effect, and regional tourism explosive development can be formed path creation effect.