首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

黑河中游不同土地利用类型下土壤碳储量及其空间变化
引用本文:张俊华,李国栋,南忠仁,肖洪浪,赵自胜.黑河中游不同土地利用类型下土壤碳储量及其空间变化[J].地理科学,2011,31(8):982-988.
作者姓名:张俊华  李国栋  南忠仁  肖洪浪  赵自胜
作者单位:1. 河南大学环境与规划学院, 河南 开封 475000;2. 兰州大学资源环境学院, 甘肃 兰州 730000;3. 中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所, 甘肃 兰州 730000
基金项目:中国科学院知识创新重大项目(KZCX1-09)资助
摘    要:通过黑河中游不同土地利用类型下土壤碳密度、碳储量的研究表明:总有机碳(TOC)、活性有机碳(AOC)、非活性有机碳(NOC)碳密度、碳储量从小到大呈不同的变化趋势。其中,NOC与TOC碳密度从大到小的空间分布基本一致,而AOC与NOC、TOC的分布存在差异,说明土地利用类型变化对三类有机碳的影响不同。经计算得到,1m深度TOC、AOC、DOC碳库总量分别为94.72、45.12、49.60Tg,DOC碳库占TOC碳库的比例略高于AOC占TOC碳库的比例。分析发现,引入AOC和NOC指标,更能真实反映出有机碳与影响因素间关系。

关 键 词:土壤有机碳  土地利用  空间变化  黑河中游
收稿时间:2010-10-18
修稿时间:2010-12-28

The Spatial Distribution of Soil Organic Carbon Storage and Change under Different Land Uses in the Middle of Heihe River
ZHANG Jun-hua,LI Guo-dong,NAN Zhong-ren,XIAO Hong-lang,ZHAO Zi-sheng.The Spatial Distribution of Soil Organic Carbon Storage and Change under Different Land Uses in the Middle of Heihe River[J].Scientia Geographica Sinica,2011,31(8):982-988.
Authors:ZHANG Jun-hua  LI Guo-dong  NAN Zhong-ren  XIAO Hong-lang  ZHAO Zi-sheng
Institution:1. The College of Environment and Planning of Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan 475000, China;2. College of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China;3. Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China
Abstract:Spatial distribution of soil organic carbon density, storage and its change are researched under different land uses in the middle of Heihe River, based on the multi-methods of gathering field samples, laboratory analysis, GIS spatial analysis model and remote sensing. The results show that obvious spatial otherness of total soil carbon (TOC), active organic carbon (AOC), nonactive organic carbon (NOC) exist under different land uses. NOC density is consistent with TOC, but density of AOC is different. It indicates that impacts of land use changes on TOC, AOC and NOC are different. According to the calculation result, storage of TOC, AOC and NOC is 94.72 Tg, 45.12 Tg and 49.60 Tg in 1m depths, respectively. AOC account is for 47.63% and NOC is 52.36%. It’s found that the relationship between SOC and influencing factors is more authentic if AOC and NOC are introduced.
Keywords:
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《地理科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《地理科学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号