首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

宜居城市的理论基础和评价研究进展
引用本文:李业锦,张文忠,田山川,余建辉.宜居城市的理论基础和评价研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2008,27(3):101-119.
作者姓名:李业锦  张文忠  田山川  余建辉
作者单位:1. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京,100101;中国科学院研究生院,北京,100049
2. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京,100101
摘    要:1898 年霍华德提出的“田园城市”是对城市的繁荣和发展带来昂贵代价的反思。宜居城市的提出,成为解决 城市可持续发展的重要选择之一。目前宜居城市研究还是一个有待深入研究的新领域,本文总结了宜居城市的研 究进展和主要学术观点,重点回顾了宜居城市概念、内涵等研究内容,集中讨论了宜居城市的影响因素、评价体系 和评价方法,并指出宜居城市研究还存在的不足之处和未来的研究方向。

关 键 词:宜居城市  人居环境  理论基础  评价
收稿时间:2008-04-01
修稿时间:2008-05-01

Review of the Theor ies and Methods of Livable City
LI Yejin,ZHANG Wenzhong,TIAN Shanchuan,YU Jianhui.Review of the Theor ies and Methods of Livable City[J].Progress in Geography,2008,27(3):101-119.
Authors:LI Yejin  ZHANG Wenzhong  TIAN Shanchuan  YU Jianhui
Institution:1. Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
2. Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China
Abstract:In 1898, Ebenezer Howard, worrying about the problems behind the prosperity of British cities, put forward the theory of "garden city". One hundred years later, with the acceleration of urbanization, the same problems occur in China. Recently, the concept of "livable city" is presented as a realistic choice for sustainable urban development. In 2005, "Livable Beijing" became a strategic development goal of Beijing in its Master Plan. Since then the need for theoretical studies of "livable city" is urgent. However, the research field of livable city is still a new one. The concept and relevant methodology of "livable city" is still vague. On this background, this paper reviews current research progreses and trends in this field, summarizes general understandings of "livable city", and discusses the evaluation structures and methods of it. It also points out three deficiencies in current research: first, theoretical study of "livable city" is still weak, and there are few studies on driving forces of livability; second, in terms of the research scale, studies on urban livability are focused more on city-based studies than on community-based and regional-based studies; and third, for research approaches, most studies have emphasized the method of presenting an evaluation index system, but new evaluation methods are inadequate.
Keywords:livable city  human settlement  evaluation  review
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《地理科学进展》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《地理科学进展》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号