首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Grenvillian remnants in the Northern Andes: Rodinian and Phanerozoic paleogeographic perspectives
Authors:A Cardona  D Chew  VA Valencia  G Bayona  A Mi?kovi?  M Ibañez-Mejía
Institution:1. Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Geneva, Rue des Maraichers 13, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland;2. Institute of Mineralogy and Geochemistry, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland;3. Instituto Colombiano del Petróleo, Ecopetrol, Bucaramanga, Colombia;1. Department of Mineralogy, University of Geneva, Switzerland;2. Institute of Geosciences, Mineralogy, J. W. Goethe University, Frankfurt 60438, Germany;3. Institute of Mineralogy and Geochemistry, University of Lausanne, Switzerland;4. Instituto Colombiano del Petróleo-Ecopetrol, Bucaramanga, Colombia;5. Tectonic Analysis Ltd., Geneva, Switzerland;6. Department of Earth Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa;1. Departamento de Geociencias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia;2. Institut des Sciences de la Terre, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
Abstract:Grenvillian crust is encountered in several basement inliers in the northern Andes of Colombia, Ecuador and Peru and is also represented as a major detrital or inherited component within Neoproterozoic to Paleozoic sedimentary and magmatic rocks. This review of the tectonic and geochronological record of the Grenvillian belt in the northern Andes suggests that these crustal segments probably formed on an active continental margin in which associated arc and back-arc magmatism evolved from ca. 1.25 to 1.16 Ga, possibly extending to as young as 1.08 Ga.The lithostratigraphic and tectonic history of the Grenvillian belt in the northern Andes differs from that of the Sunsas belt on the southwest Amazonian Craton and from the Grenvillian belt of Eastern Laurentia. It is considered that this belt, along with similar terranes of Grenvillian age in Middle America and Mexico define a separate composite orogen which formed on the northwestern margin of the Amazonian Craton. Microcontinent accretion and interaction with the Sveconorwegian province on Baltica is a feasible tectonic scenario, in line with recent paleogeographic reconstructions of the Rodinian supercontinent. Although Phanerozoic tectonics may have redistributed some of these terranes, they are still viewed as para-autocthonous domains that remained in proximity to the margin of Amazonia. Paleogeographic data derived from Phanerozoic rocks suggest that some of the Colombian Grenvillian fragments were connected to northernmost Peru and Ecuador until the Mesozoic, whereas the Mexican terranes where attached to the Colombian margin until Pangea fragmentation in Late Triassic times.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号