| 催化电解杀菌与次氯酸钠杀菌的对比 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 华萍,傅绍斌,刘泽强,周成刚,吴金平.催化电解杀菌与次氯酸钠杀菌的对比[J].地质科技情报,2005,24(4):91-93. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 华萍 傅绍斌 刘泽强 周成刚 吴金平 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国地质大学材料科学与化学工程学院,武汉,430074;中国地质大学研究生院,武汉,430074;长江大学石油工程学院,湖北,荆州,434102;中国地质大学研究生院,武汉,430074 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 油田回注水催化电解杀菌与次氯酸钠杀菌在杀菌机理、效果及应用成本3方面的对比结果表明,催化电解产生有效氯是主要的杀菌机理.催化电解产生的有效氯质量浓度与电解时间呈线性关系,杀菌率随着有效氯质量浓度的增大而增大.定量杀菌的对比结果表明,油田回注水催化电解杀菌比次氯酸钠杀菌效果好,且不须投加任何药剂,只消耗电能,运行成本低.
|
| 关 键 词： | 形稳阳极 油田回注水 催化电解杀菌 硫酸盐还原菌 腐生菌 |
| 文章编号： | 1000-7849(2005)04-0091-03 |
| 收稿时间： | 2005-05-29 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005年5月29日 |
Comparison of Catalytic Electrolysis Disinfection and Hypochlorite Disinfection |
| |
| HUA Ping,FU Shao-bin,LIU Ze-qiang,ZHOU Cheng-gang,WU Jin-ping.Comparison of Catalytic Electrolysis Disinfection and Hypochlorite Disinfection[J].Geological Science and Technology Information,2005,24(4):91-93. |
| |
| Authors: | HUA Ping FU Shao-bin LIU Ze-qiang ZHOU Cheng-gang WU Jin-ping |
| |
| Institution: | 1a. Faculty of Material Science and Chemical Engineering ;1b. Graduate School, China University of Geosciences ,Wuhan 430074 China ;2. Institute of Petroleum Engineering, Yangtze University, J ingzhou Hubei 434102, China |
| |
| Abstract: | A comparison study on the catalytic electrolysis and hypochlorite disinfection of oil-field injection water is carried out. The results show that available chlorine produced during electrolysis process is the main agent of catalytic electrolysis disinfection. Quantitative comparison of hypoehlorite agent suggests that catalytic electrolysis disinfection has a better effect and a much lower cost. |
| |
| Keywords: | dimensionally stable anode oil field injection water catalytic electrolysis disinfection sulfate-reducing bacteria metatrophic bacteria |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
