首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

新疆雅满苏铁矿床矽卡岩和磁铁矿矿物学特征及其地质意义
引用本文:曾,红 柴凤梅 周,刚 耿新霞 李,强 孟庆鹏 徐璐璐.新疆雅满苏铁矿床矽卡岩和磁铁矿矿物学特征及其地质意义[J].中国地质,2014,41(6):1914-1928.
作者姓名:  红 柴凤梅 周  刚 耿新霞 李  强 孟庆鹏 徐璐璐
作者单位:新疆大学地质与勘查工程学院新疆中亚造山带大陆动力学与成矿预测实验室;新疆地质矿产勘查开发局;中国地质科学院矿产资源研究所国土资源部成矿作用与资源评价重点开放实验室;新疆维吾尔自治区矿产实验研究所;
基金项目:国土资源部公益性行业科研专项(201211073-03);国家重点基础研究发展计划“973”项目(2012CB416803)资助
摘    要:雅满苏铁矿床位于东天山中段,矿体赋存于下石炭统雅满苏组安山质火山碎屑岩中,受近EW向断裂及环形断裂构造控制。矿体主要呈层状、似层状、透镜状,近矿围岩蚀变强烈,形成石榴石矽卡岩及复杂矽卡岩。电子探针分析结果表明,石榴石为钙铁榴石-钙铝榴石系列,其化学组成可表示为And45.68~100Gro0.67~57.95(A1m+Sps)11~29.03,与典型的矽卡岩型铁矿中石榴石端员组分相似。在磁铁矿Ca+Al+Mn-Ti+V图解中,大部分样品落入矽卡岩型铁矿区;TiO2-Al2O3-MgO图解中,大多数的样品落入沉积变质接触交代磁铁矿趋势区,部分早期磁铁矿落在岩浆趋势区内。结合矿床地质特征和矿物学研究,认为大多数样品经过了一个热液交代作用过程,表明雅满苏铁矿的形成与岩浆热液交代作用有关。

关 键 词:雅满苏铁矿床  电子探针分析  矽卡岩  磁铁矿

Mineralogy of skarn and magnetite of the Yamansu iron deposit and its geological significance
ZENG Hong,CHAI Feng-mei,ZHOU Gang,GENG Xin-xi,LI Qiang,MENG Qing-peng,XU Lu-lu.Mineralogy of skarn and magnetite of the Yamansu iron deposit and its geological significance[J].Chinese Geology,2014,41(6):1914-1928.
Authors:ZENG Hong  CHAI Feng-mei  ZHOU Gang  GENG Xin-xi  LI Qiang  MENG Qing-peng  XU Lu-lu
Institution:1.Xinjiang Key Laboratory for Geodynamic Processes and Metallogenic Prognosis of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt, Xinjiang University, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830046; 2.Xinjiang Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830000; 3.MRL Key Laboratory of Metallogeny and Mineral Assessment, Institute of Mineral Resources, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037; 4.Xinjiang Mineral Experiment Research Institute Urumuqi 830000
Abstract:Abstract: Located in the middle of Eastern Tianshan Mountains, the large-size Yamansu iron deposit is hosted in Andesitic volcanic clastic rock or andesitic tuff of the Lower Carboniferous Yamansu Formation, with a lenticular marble beneath the main ore body. The ore bodies occur as lamellar stratoids and lenses, controlled by EW-striking faults and circular faults. Wall rock alteration is strong, including garnet skarn and complex skarn. Electeon microprobe analyses show that the end member of garnet is andradite(And) with an average content of 63.59%, grossularite(Gro) with an average content of 34.11%, almandite(Alm) and spessartine(Sps) with an average content of 4.44%. Components of garnet and pyroxene are And45.68~100Gro0.67~57.95(A1m+Sps)11~29.03, which indicates that characteristics of this skarn minerals are quite similar to those in calcic skarn from the major large iron deposits, suggesting that they probably resulted from skarnization; In the Ca+Al+Mn versus Ti+V discriminant diagram showing spot analyses of magnetite and hematite, almost all data from the Yamansu ore deposit fall into the region of the skarn type iron deposit. In addition, in the ternary plot of Ti02-Al203-Mg0 of magnetite, many data from the Yamansu ore deposit tend to be seated in the sedimentary metamorphogenic and contact meatasomatic region while less data drop into magmatic mafic-ultramafic region. These two diagrams may suggest that the formation mechanism of magnetite from this ore deposit may be similar to that of magnetite from skarn iron deposits. Combining the geological characteristics with the study of mineralogy, the authors hold that most samples through a process of hydrothermal metasomatism, it indicates that iron formation was related to magmatic hydrothermal metasomatism.
Keywords:Yamansu iron deposit  electron microprobe analysis  skarn mineral  magnetite
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国地质》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国地质》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号