首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

秦岭造山带的差异隆升特征--花岗岩40Ar/39Ar年代学研究的证据
引用本文:王非,朱日祥,李齐,贺怀宇,罗清华,卢欣祥,桑海清,王英兰.秦岭造山带的差异隆升特征--花岗岩40Ar/39Ar年代学研究的证据[J].地学前缘,2004,11(4):445-459.
作者姓名:王非  朱日祥  李齐  贺怀宇  罗清华  卢欣祥  桑海清  王英兰
作者单位:中国科学院,地质与地球物理研究所,北京,100029;中国地震局,地质研究所,北京,100029;台湾大学,地质学系,台湾,台北;河南省地质科学研究所,河南,郑州,450053
基金项目:国家自然科学基金,49973018,
摘    要:分别出露于东、西秦岭的曹坪和沙河湾岩体、老君山和秦岭梁岩体 ,是秦岭全面碰撞后于三叠纪末 (T3 )侵入的花岗岩体 ,其冷却历史记录了秦岭陆内造山阶段的初期隆升过程。通过对角闪石、黑云母和钾长石的40 Ar/ 3 9Ar年龄测定 ,以及对钾长石40 Ar/ 3 9Ar年龄谱进行的多重扩散域模拟计算 ,发现东、西秦岭经历了完全不同的冷却历史 :从晚三叠世末至早侏罗世 ,东、西秦岭同时由 5 0 0℃开始快速冷却 ,之后东秦岭经过一个短暂的稳定期 (约 2 0Ma)后又持续快速冷却 ,至中侏罗世末即已通过 15 0℃等温线 (约地表下 3~ 5km) ;而西秦岭在早侏罗世至晚白垩世初的近 10 0Ma中一直处于稳定平缓的状态 ,至晚白垩世中期才快速冷却至 15 0℃。这种不同的冷却历史可能反映了东、西秦岭的差异隆升过程。

关 键 词:花岗岩  40Ar/39Ar年代学  MDD模式  秦岭
文章编号:1005-2321(2004)04-0445-10
修稿时间:2004年4月21日

A differential uplifting of Qinling orogeny belt evidences from 40Ar/39Ar thermochronology of granites
WANG Fei,ZHU Ri-xiang,LI Qi,HE Huai-yu,LUO Qing-hua,LU Xin-xiang,SANG Hai-qing,WANG Ying-lan.A differential uplifting of Qinling orogeny belt evidences from 40Ar/39Ar thermochronology of granites[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2004,11(4):445-459.
Authors:WANG Fei  ZHU Ri-xiang  LI Qi  HE Huai-yu  LUO Qing-hua  LU Xin-xiang  SANG Hai-qing  WANG Ying-lan
Institution:WANG Fei~1,ZHU Ri-xiang~1,LI Qi~2,HE Huai-yu~1,LUO Qing-hua~3,LU Xin-xiang~4,SANG Hai-qing~1,WANG Ying-lan~1
Abstract:Caoping and Shahewan granite plutons, and Laojunshan and Qinlingliang granite plutons occur on Shangdan suture zone at east and west segments of Qinling orogenic belt, respectively. They emplaced simultaneously at the end of the Triassic when the Qinling orogenic belt had finished its collision and the intraplate deformation commenced. Therefore, the granite plutons had experienced the deformation and recorded the uplifting process in their cooling histories. The~(40)Ar/~(39)Ar dating on hornblendes, biotites and alkali feldspars, combining the multi-domain diffusion modeling on alkali feldspars show that the east and west segments of Qinling orogeny belt experienced much different cooling histories: from the end of Late Triassic to the Early Jurassic, both segments simultaneously cooled down rapidly from 500 ℃; then the east Qinling belt experienced a short stationary period (nearly 20 Ma), and then steadily cooled down again so rapidly that the temperature already dropped down across the isotherm of 150 ℃ (nearly 3~5 km below the surface) at the end of Mid-Jurassic; whereas the west Qinling belt was in a stable status around 300 ℃ for about 100 million years from the Early Jurassic to the Late Cretaceous, and cooled down rapidly to 150 ℃ at the middle of the Late Cretaceous. These different cooling histories may reflect the differential uplifting of Qinling orogeny belt.
Keywords:granite  ~(40)Ar/~(39)Ar chronology  MDD model  Qinling orogeny belt
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号