首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

不同采样点数量下土壤有机质含量空间预测方法对比
引用本文:苏晓燕,赵永存,杨浩,陆访仪,孙维侠,王火焰,黄标,胡文友.不同采样点数量下土壤有机质含量空间预测方法对比[J].地学前缘,2011,18(6):34-40.
作者姓名:苏晓燕  赵永存  杨浩  陆访仪  孙维侠  王火焰  黄标  胡文友
作者单位:1. 南京师范大学地理科学学院,江苏南京210046/中国科学院土壤环境与污染修复重点实验室南京土壤研究所,江苏南京210008
2. 中国科学院土壤环境与污染修复重点实验室南京土壤研究所,江苏南京,210008
3. 南京师范大学地理科学学院,江苏南京,210046
基金项目:国家自然科学基金科学部主任基金项目(41040009);中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目(KZCX2-EW-QN404);国家重点基础研究发展计划“973”项目(2010CB950702)
摘    要:运用普通克里格、泛克里格、协同克里格和回归克里格4种方法,结合由DEM获取的高程因子以及土壤全氮和阳离子交换量(CEC),预测了黑龙江省海伦市耕地有机质含量的空间分布。不同样点数量下海伦市土壤有机质含量的空间变异结构分析表明,样点数量多并不一定能够识别土壤有机质含量的结构性连续组分,最优化的布置采样点位置可能比单纯增加...

关 键 词:土壤有机质  普通克里格  泛克里格  协同克里格  回归克里格

A comparison of predictive methods for mapping the spatial distribution of soil organic matter content with different sampling densities
Su Xiaoyan,Zhao Yongcun,Yang Hao,Lu Fangyi,Sun Weixia,Wang Huoyan,Huang Biao,Hu Wenyou.A comparison of predictive methods for mapping the spatial distribution of soil organic matter content with different sampling densities[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2011,18(6):34-40.
Authors:Su Xiaoyan  Zhao Yongcun  Yang Hao  Lu Fangyi  Sun Weixia  Wang Huoyan  Huang Biao  Hu Wenyou
Institution:1.School of Geography Science,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210046,China 2.Key Laboratory of Soil Environment and Pollution Remediation,Institute of Soil Science,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Nanjing 210008,China
Abstract:Soil organic matter(SOM) is extremely important for maintaining soil fertility and linking carbon cycle within terrestrial ecosystem.In order to quantify the spatial patterns of SOM content in Hailun County of China,ordinary kriging(OK),universal kriging(UK),co-kriging(CK),regression kriging(RK),and secondary data derived from soil total nitrogen(TN),cation exchangeable capacity(CEC) and digital elevation model(DEM) were employed to map the spatial distribution patterns of SOM with different sampling densities.The results of SOM spatial structures identified by different sampling densities indicated that the increase of soil sampling densities may not benefit the identification of SOM continuous component and optimal design of sampling locations was even more important than improving sampling densities.With respect to spatial predictive performance,CK with TN as co-variable always had the highest accuracy,and more than 50% of the SOM variation can be explained by CK method.The local detail of SOM variability derived from CK method also outperformed OK,UK,and RK,and the predictive accuracy of RK method may not be improved when compared with univariate OK method.The soil sampling density is not the exclusive factor affecting the spatial predictive accuracy of SOM,and secondary data(ancillary information) significantly correlated to SOM as well as denser coverage of the study area would be more helpful for improving the spatial predictive performance of SOM with limited number of soil samples.
Keywords:soil Organic matter  ordinary kriging  universal kriging  co-kriging  regression kriging
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《地学前缘》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《地学前缘》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号