首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

生物滞留带结构层参数对道路径流滞蓄效应影响
引用本文:高建平,潘俊奎,谢义昌.生物滞留带结构层参数对道路径流滞蓄效应影响[J].水科学进展,2017,28(5):702-711.
作者姓名:高建平  潘俊奎  谢义昌
作者单位:重庆交通大学土木工程学院, 重庆 400074
基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(51378520);重庆市研究生科研创新项目(CYB16108)
摘    要:基于非饱和土壤水分运动理论,采用数值模拟方法研究了4种降雨作用下生物滞留带结构层参数对设施积水、产流及径流调控效应的影响特性。结果表明:生物滞留带表层积水受蓄水层深度影响显著,随蓄水层深度由20 cm增加到30 cm,设施的溢流控制水量平均提高0.196 m3左右,但积水时长增加可达85 min;生物滞留带各结构层参数对穿孔管产流均有一定影响,随种植土层与砂滤层厚度比或内部储水区高度增加,穿孔管产流时刻推迟,产流峰值减小,而蓄水层深度的增加则可导致穿孔管产流时刻提前、产流峰值增大;在4种降雨作用下,5类滞留带径流量平均消减率为16.71%~37.31%,径流峰值平均消减率为41.53%~63.90%,产流平均延迟时间为97.75~166.50 min;当滞留带发生溢流时,设施的径流调控能力显著降低,且结构层参数对设施径流调控效果的影响减弱。

关 键 词:生物滞留带    道路径流    结构层参数    径流调控    滞蓄效应
收稿时间:2017-02-13

Effects of bioretention structural layer parameters on detention and retention for road runoff
GAO Jianping,PAN Junkui,XIE Yichang.Effects of bioretention structural layer parameters on detention and retention for road runoff[J].Advances in Water Science,2017,28(5):702-711.
Authors:GAO Jianping  PAN Junkui  XIE Yichang
Institution:School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China
Abstract:Based on theoretical unsaturated soil water movement, the effects of different bioretention structural layer parameters on ponding, outflow, and runoff regulation were studied under four types of rainfall using a numerical simulation method. Based on the results, ponding was significantly affected by the depth of the surface aquifer. With increasing depth from 20 cm to 30 cm, the overflow control water was increased by about 0.196 m3, while the ponding duration increased by up to 85 min. Bioretention structural layer parameters all had some influence on the outflow of the perforated pipe. As the soil layer to sand layer thickness ratio or the internal water storage zone height increased, the outflow of the perforated pipe was delayed and the peak of the flow decreased, while the increase in aquifer depth led to the advancement of the outflow time and increase in the flow peak. Under the four types of rainfall studied, the average runoff reduction rate of the five types of bioretention ranged from 16.71% to 37.31%, the average reduction rate of the runoff peak ranged from 41.53% to 63.90%, and the average runoff delay time ranged from 97.75 min to 166.50 min. In the case of overflow, the performance of bioretention methods on runoff regulation was significantly reduced, and the effects of structural layer parameters on runoff regulation were weakened.
Keywords:bioretention  road runoff  structural layer parameters  runoff regulation  detention and retention  
点击此处可从《水科学进展》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《水科学进展》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号