首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

改进的AHP在县域尺度暴雨洪涝风险评价的应用
引用本文:戴娟,潘益农,刘青,唐怀瓯.改进的AHP在县域尺度暴雨洪涝风险评价的应用[J].气象科学,2014,34(4):428-434.
作者姓名:戴娟  潘益农  刘青  唐怀瓯
作者单位:南京大学 大气科学学院, 南京 210093;安徽省气候中心, 合肥 230031;南京大学 大气科学学院, 南京 210093;安徽师范大学 国土资源与旅游学院, 安徽芜湖 241003;安徽省气象信息中心, 合肥 230031
基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(41101035;41105080);教育部高校博士学科点专项科研基金(20113424120002,20123424110001)
摘    要:以淮河流域为例,选取降水、土地利用、经济、人口等指标作为淮河流域暴雨洪涝灾害风险指标,利用信息熵改进的层次分析法确定淮河流域暴雨洪涝的风险评估指标权重,并应用于县域尺度淮河流域暴雨洪涝灾害风险评价。结果表明:(1)淮河流域暴雨洪涝灾害风险空间分布整体呈现南部高、北部低,东西高、中部次之的形态。(2)改进的层次分析法得到的高风险区比传统方法的面积减少,市县个数下降,而次高风险区、中风险区、次低以及低风险区面积比之传统方法均有增加。同时风险平均值升高,导致受灾程度可能加大。(3)改进方法得到的岳西县风险等级由高风险区降为次高风险区,低于金寨县风险等级。宿州市风险等级由次高风险区降为中风险区,较灵璧、泗县风险低,与实际情况更为相符,提高了淮河流域暴雨洪涝灾害风险评价精度。

关 键 词:洪涝  风险评价  层次分析  信息熵  县域尺度
收稿时间:2013/9/25 0:00:00
修稿时间:2013/12/3 0:00:00

Application of improved AHP in county-scale rainstorm and flood risk assessment
DAI Juan,PAN Yinong,LIU Qing and TANG Huaiou.Application of improved AHP in county-scale rainstorm and flood risk assessment[J].Scientia Meteorologica Sinica,2014,34(4):428-434.
Authors:DAI Juan  PAN Yinong  LIU Qing and TANG Huaiou
Institution:School of Atmospheric Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China;Anhui Climate Center, Hefei 230031, China;School of Atmospheric Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China;College of Territorial Resources and Tourism, Anhui Normal University, Anhui Wuhu 241003, China;Anhui Meteorological Information Center, Hefei 230031, China
Abstract:Taking Huaihe river basin as example, the precipitation, land utilization, economy and population were selected as rainstorm and flood risk indexes and their importance was determined by modified Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) based on comentropy. The application of improved AHP in the county-scale rainstorm and flood risk shows that (1)The spatial distribution of rainstorm and flood risk in Huaihe river basin appears high in the south but low in the north; high in the east and west and followed by the middle. (2) The area of high risk regions and the number of cities and counties in this region evaluated by the modified AHP all decreases compared with traditional methods, but the area of the secondary high risk regions, medium risk regions, secondary low risk and low risk regions all increase. Meanwhile, the rising of the average risk possibility may lead to the increasing of disaster degree. (3)The risk grade deduced by the improved method in Yuexi county is lower than that in Jinzhai county. In Suzhou, the risk grade descends from secondary high risk to medium risk, which is lower than that in Lingbi and Sixian and is more consistent with actual situation. Therefore, it is concluded that the modified AHP improves the precision of rainstorm and flood risk assessment in Huaihe river basion.
Keywords:Flood  Risk assessment  Analytic hierarchy process  Comentropy  County scale
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《气象科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《气象科学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号