首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Experiments of DSAEF_LTP Model with Two Improved Parameters for Accumulated Precipitation of Landfalling Tropical Cyclones over Southeast China
Authors:QIN Si  JIA Li  DING Chen-chen  REN Fu-min  John L McBride and LI Guo-ping
Institution:1. College of Atmospheric Sciences, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu 610225 China;2. State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing 100081 China,1. State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing 100081 China,1. State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing 100081 China,1. College of Atmospheric Sciences, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu 610225 China;2. State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing 100081 China,1. School of Earth Science, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010 Australia;2. Research and Development Division, Bureau of Meteorology, Melbourne, VIC 3010 Australia and 1. College of Atmospheric Sciences, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu 610225 China
Abstract:The Dynamical-Statistical-Analog Ensemble Forecast model for landfalling tropical cyclones (TCs) precipitation (DSAEF_LTP) utilises an operational numerical weather prediction (NWP) model for the forecast track, while the precipitation forecast is obtained by finding analog cyclones, and making a precipitation forecast from an ensemble of the analogs. This study addresses TCs that occurred from 2004 to 2019 in Southeast China with 47 TCs as training samples and 18 TCs for independent forecast experiments. Experiments use four model versions. The control experiment DSAEF_LTP_1 includes three factors including TC track, landfall season, and TC intensity to determine analogs. Versions DSAEF_LTP_2, DSAEF_LTP_3, and DSAEF_LTP_4 respectively integrate improved similarity region, improved ensemble method, and improvements in both parameters. Results show that the DSAEF_LTP model with new values of similarity region and ensemble method (DSAEF_LTP_4) performs best in the simulation experiment, while the DSAEF_LTP model with new values only of ensemble method (DSAEF_LTP_3) performs best in the forecast experiment. The reason for the difference between simulation (training sample) and forecast (independent sample) may be that the proportion of TC with typical tracks (southeast to northwest movement or landfall over Southeast China) has changed significantly between samples. Forecast performance is compared with that of three global dynamical models (ECMWF, GRAPES, and GFS) and a regional dynamical model (SMS-WARMS). The DSAEF_LTP model performs better than the dynamical models and tends to produce more false alarms in accumulated forecast precipitation above 250 mm and 100 mm. Compared with TCs without heavy precipitation or typical tracks, TCs with these characteristics are better forecasted by the DSAEF_LTP model.
Keywords:DSAEF_LTP  parameters improvement  TC precipitation forecast
点击此处可从《热带气象学报(英文版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《热带气象学报(英文版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号