首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

短周期地震仪接收函数的可行性分析——以新疆和田地震台阵为例
引用本文:唐明帅,葛粲,郑勇,王海涛.短周期地震仪接收函数的可行性分析——以新疆和田地震台阵为例[J].地球物理学报,2013,56(8):2670-2680.
作者姓名:唐明帅  葛粲  郑勇  王海涛
作者单位:1. 新疆维吾尔自治区地震局, 乌鲁木齐 830011; 2. 中国科学院大地测量与地球物理研究所大地测量与地球动力学国家重点实验室, 武汉 430077; 3. 中国科学院大学地球科学学院, 北京 100049
基金项目:国家自然科学基金,地震公益性行业科研专项项目,中国地震局"测震台网青年骨干培养"专项,新疆地震科学基金项目
摘    要:利用新疆和田地震台阵3 km孔径范围内架设的9个子台(包括1套宽频带和9套短周期地震仪)记录的3年远震波形数据,对比研究和分析了短周期地震仪接收函数的稳定性和可靠性.通过比较和分析短周期和长周期地震仪获取的接收函数波形,结果发现:(1)短周期地震仪记录与宽频带地震仪记录得到的接收函数有很好的一致性,且具有较高的稳定性,无论α取值为1.5还是2.5,短周期地震仪接收函数与宽频带地震仪接收函数都具有较强的线性相关性(相关系数0.9),但Ps震相均存在小幅的振幅差(约20%);(2)采用接收函数震相到时信息的方法(如H-κ叠加搜索),短周期地震仪可以代替宽频带地震仪;(3)由于短周期地震仪缺乏0.155 Hz以下的低频信号和在1 Hz以下频段非线性的振幅响应,仅仅采用短周期地震仪接收函数波形反演台站下方S波速度结构,获得下地壳到上地幔顶部的速度偏差较大(约0.3 km/s),可能会造成错误解释(如下地壳低速层),因此需要和其它对波速值敏感的数据(如面波频散)进行联合分析.

关 键 词:和田台阵  接收函数  短周期地震仪  可行性  
收稿时间:2012-07-30

Feasibility analysis of short-period seismograph receiver function——An example of Hotan Seismic Array, Xinjiang
TANG Ming-Shuai , GE Can , ZHENG Yong , WANG Hai-Tao.Feasibility analysis of short-period seismograph receiver function——An example of Hotan Seismic Array, Xinjiang[J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics,2013,56(8):2670-2680.
Authors:TANG Ming-Shuai  GE Can  ZHENG Yong  WANG Hai-Tao
Institution:1. Earthquake Administration of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region.Urumqi 830011,China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Geodesy and Earth Geodynamics, Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430077, China; 3. School of Earth Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Abstract:Using the teleseismic waveform data recorded by 9 sub-stations (including 1 set of broadband and 9 sets of short-period seismographs) of Hotan Seismic Array with an aperture about 3 km in 3 years, we studied and analysed the stability and reliability of short-period seismograph receiver function. By comparative analysis of the receiver function waveforms isolated from teleseismic waveform data recorded by short-period and broadband seismographs, the following results are obtained. (1) Receiver functions of short-period and broadband seismographs are very consistent and highly stable, they have good linear correlation (correlation coefficient 0.9), but Ps seismic phases have small amplitude difference (about 20%), whenever the Gaussian coefficient value is 1.5 or 2.5. (2) The short-period seismograph receiver functions can replace broadband seismograph receiver functions, if a method using the seismic phase arrival time of receiver functions is adopted (such as grid-stacking-search method). (3) The result may cause wrong interpretation (e.g., the lower crust low-velocity layer) if only the waveform data of short-period seismograph receiver functions are used to invert for crustal S-wave velocity structure, because there exist large velocity deviations (about 0.3 km/s) from lower crust to upper mantle, due to lack of low frequency information under 0.155 Hz and the nonlinear amplitude response under 1 Hz of the short-period seismographs; so additional data sensitive to wave velocity value (such as surface wave dispersion) are needed for joint analysis.
Keywords:Hotan Seismic Array  Receiver function  Short-period seismograph  Feasibility
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《地球物理学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《地球物理学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号