首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Intelligent modelling of clay compressibility using hybrid meta-heuristic and machine learning algorithms
Authors:Pin Zhang  Zhen-Yu Yin  Yin-Fu Jin  Tommy H.T. Chan  Fu-Ping Gao
Affiliation:Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Horn, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China;School of Civil Engineering&Built Environment, Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of Technology(QUT), Brisbane, Qld, 4001, Australia;Key Laboratory for Mechanics in Fluid Solid Coupling Systems, Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China;China School of Engineering Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
Abstract:Compression index Cc is an essential parameter in geotechnical design for which the effectiveness of correlation is still a challenge. This paper suggests a novel modelling approach using machine learning (ML) technique. The performance of five commonly used machine learning (ML) algorithms, i.e. back-propagation neural network (BPNN), extreme learning machine (ELM), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF) and evolutionary polynomial regression (EPR) in predicting Cc is comprehensively investigated. A database with a total number of 311 datasets including three input variables, i.e. initial void ratio e0, liquid limit water content wL, plasticity index Ip, and one output variable Cc is first established. Genetic algorithm (GA) is used to optimize the hyper-parameters in five ML algorithms, and the average prediction error for the 10-fold cross-validation (CV) sets is set as the fitness function in the GA for enhancing the robustness of ML models. The results indicate that ML models outperform empirical prediction formulations with lower prediction error. RF yields the lowest error followed by BPNN, ELM, EPR and SVM. If the ranges of input variables in the database are large enough, BPNN and RF models are recommended to predict Cc. Furthermore, if the distribution of input variables is continuous, RF model is the best one. Otherwise, EPR model is recommended if the ranges of input variables are small. The predicted correlations between input and output variables using five ML models show great agreement with the physical explanation.
Keywords:Compressibility  Clays  Machine learning  Optimization  Random forest  Genetic algorithm
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号