首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

引黄工程AE法与水压法地应力测量对比
引用本文:丁原辰,邵兆刚. 引黄工程AE法与水压法地应力测量对比[J]. 地质力学学报, 1996, 2(1): 70-76
作者姓名:丁原辰  邵兆刚
作者单位:中国地质科学院地质力学研究所
基金项目:地质矿产部地质力学所开放研究实验室课题内容之一
摘    要:本文在说明AE(声发射)法在引黄工程地应力测量实施过程中的作用之后,简要介绍了AE估测法和估测结果,并与水压致裂法测量结果相对比,给出测量结果的评价性结论是两法测量结果近乎一致。AE法估计500m深度最大主应力值为26.7MPa。 

关 键 词:声发射(AE)法   凯瑟效应   地应力

A COMPARISON OF THE RESULTS OF STRESS MEASUREMENTS OBTAINED BY AE WITH THAT BY HYDROFRACTURING AT TAIYUAN,SHANXI
Ding Yuanchen and Shao Zhaogang. A COMPARISON OF THE RESULTS OF STRESS MEASUREMENTS OBTAINED BY AE WITH THAT BY HYDROFRACTURING AT TAIYUAN,SHANXI[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 1996, 2(1): 70-76
Authors:Ding Yuanchen and Shao Zhaogang
Affiliation:Institute of Geomechanics, CAGS
Abstract:Acoustic Emission stress determination method was applied at Taiyuan, Shanxi, for the water-diversion project and the results obtained are given in the paper.A comparison of the results with that by hydrofracturing shows a good agreement of the measurements. The maximum principal stress estimated by AE at a depth of 500m is 26.7MPa.
Keywords:AE  Kaiser effect  geostress
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《地质力学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《地质力学学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号