首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

引黄工程AE法与水压法地应力测量对比
引用本文:丁原辰,邵兆刚.引黄工程AE法与水压法地应力测量对比[J].地质力学学报,1996,2(1):70-76.
作者姓名:丁原辰  邵兆刚
作者单位:中国地质科学院地质力学研究所,中国地质科学院地质力学研究所
基金项目:地质矿产部地质力学所开放研究实验室课题内容之一
摘    要:本文在说明AE(声发射)法在引黄工程地应力测量实施过程中的作用之后,简要介绍了AE估测法和估测结果,并与水压致裂法测量结果相对比,给出测量结果的评价性结论是两法测量结果近乎一致。AE法估计500m深度最大主应力值为26.7MPa。

关 键 词:声发射法  地应力  水压法测量  引黄工程

A COMPARISON OF THE RESULTS OF STRESS MEASUREMENTS OBTAINED BY AE WITH THAT BY HYDROFRACTURING AT TAIYUAN,SHANXI
Ding Yuanchen and Shao Zhaogang.A COMPARISON OF THE RESULTS OF STRESS MEASUREMENTS OBTAINED BY AE WITH THAT BY HYDROFRACTURING AT TAIYUAN,SHANXI[J].Journal of Geomechanics,1996,2(1):70-76.
Authors:Ding Yuanchen and Shao Zhaogang
Institution:Institute of Geomechanics, CAGS and Institute of Geomechanics, CAGS
Abstract:Acoustic Emission stress determination method was applied at Taiyuan, Shanxi, for the water-diversion project and the results obtained are given in the paper.A comparison of the results with that by hydrofracturing shows a good agreement of the measurements. The maximum principal stress estimated by AE at a depth of 500m is 26.7MPa.
Keywords:AE  Kaiser effect  geostress
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《地质力学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《地质力学学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号