首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

三种GNSS数据下载方法对比分析CSCD
引用本文:吴汤婷,梁乔,陈本富,卢立果.三种GNSS数据下载方法对比分析CSCD[J].全球定位系统,2022,47(3):99-103.
作者姓名:吴汤婷  梁乔  陈本富  卢立果
作者单位:1.东华理工大学 资源与环境经济研究中心, 南昌 330013
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(41804020);东华理工大学资源与环境经济研究中心(21JDGL03);广西空间信息与测绘重点实验室研究基金资助(19-185-10-10);东华理工大学研究生创新基金(YC2021-S631);东华理工大学博士科研启动基金(DHBK2019182)
摘    要:为综合评估单线程、多线程和多协程在全球卫星导航系统(GNSS)数据下载中的性能,以武汉大学国际GNSS服务(IGS)数据中心为下载源,从下载文件的时间跨度和量级大小两个方面对三种方法的下载效果进行对比分析.结果表明:在中小型文件下载过程中多线程的优势大于单线程和多协程;在大型文件下载中,多协程的下载效果略优于多线程,且都相较单线程性能更佳;由于GNSS数据普遍是中小型文件,所以多线程更适用于GNSS数据下载工作.

关 键 词:全球卫星导航系统(GNSS)  数据下载  单线程  多线程  多协程
收稿时间:2021-12-06

Comparative analysis of three GNSS data download methods
Institution:1.Research Center of Resource and Environment Economics, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China2.Faculty of Geomatics, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China3.Guangxi Key Laboratory of Spatial Information and Geomatics, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541006, China
Abstract:In order to comprehensively evaluate the performance of single-thread, multi-thread, and multi-coroutine in Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) data download, this paper uses the International GNSS Service (IGS) data center of Wuhan University as the download source and analyzes the download effects of three methods in terms of the time span and magnitude of the download file. The results show that in the process of small and medium-sized files download, multi-thread has more advantages than single-thread and multi-coroutine,while for large file downloads, the download effect of multi-coroutine is slightly better than multi-thread, and both have better performance than that of single-thread. Since GNSS data file is generally small and medium-sized file, multi-thread is more suitable for GNSS data download. 
Keywords:
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《全球定位系统》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《全球定位系统》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号