| 不同成因类型堰塞湖的应急处置措施比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 邓宏艳,孔纪名,王成华.不同成因类型堰塞湖的应急处置措施比较[J].山地学报,2011,29(4). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 邓宏艳 孔纪名 王成华 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 西南交通大学土木工程学院,四川成都610031;中国科学院山地灾害与地表过程重点实验室,四川成都610041;中国科学院水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所,四川成都610041
2. 中国科学院山地灾害与地表过程重点实验室,四川成都610041;中国科学院水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所,四川成都610041 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学基金重点项目(50639070)~~ |
| |
| 摘 要： | 在对堰塞湖所造成的危害和成因类型分析的基础上,将堰塞湖分为:滑坡型堰塞湖、崩塌型堰塞湖和泥石流型堰塞湖,并对这三种类型堰塞湖所具有的特征和采取的应急处置措施进行了比较.对于不同成因类型、不同特征的堰塞湖,都要在尽可能降低堰塞湖危害的前提下,充分考虑各种因素、因地制宜的选取应急处置方式.
|
| 关 键 词： | 堰塞湖 滑坡型 崩塌型 泥石流型 应急处置 |
The Comparison of Emergency Treatment on Dammed Lakes Caused by Different Types Geologic Hazards |
| |
| DENG Hongyan
,
KONG Jiming
,
WANG Chenghua.The Comparison of Emergency Treatment on Dammed Lakes Caused by Different Types Geologic Hazards[J].Journal of Mountain Research,2011,29(4). |
| |
| Authors: | DENG Hongyan KONG Jiming WANG Chenghua |
| |
| Institution: | DENG Hongyan1,2,3,KONG Jiming2,WANG Chenghua2,3(1.School of Civil Engineering,Southwest Jiaotong University,Chengdu 610031,China,2.The Key Lab of Mountain Hazards and Earth's Surface Process,CAS,Chengdu 610041,3.Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment,Chinese Academy of Sciences & Ministry of Water Conservancy,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | First,analyze the disasters of dammed lakes and the geologic hazard types that led to dammed lakes.Based on this,sort the dammed lakes into three types: landslide type,collapse type,debris flow type.Then compare the characteristic and emergency treatments of these three types dammed lakes.For different types dammed lakes,We conclude that take emergency treatments that suit local dammed lake on the premise reducing the disasters as well as possible. |
| |
| Keywords: | dammed lake landslide type collapse type debris flow type emergency treatment |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
