旱峡剖面新民堡群的古地磁学研究

根据岩石剩磁测试资料所反映的古地磁场极性变化特征,甘肃玉门旱峡剖面原先厘定为下白垩统的新民堡群包括7个正向极性亚时带和7个反向极性亚时带。通过与国际中生代极性年表和深海沉积物极性年表的对比,新民堡群实际上可分为两个地层单位:以第三个反向极性亚时带为界(从下往上数),下部层段属于上侏罗说(厚约460m),上部层段属下白垩统(厚约636m)。剖面玄武岩脉的喷溢时代应早于中新世,晚于旱白垩世,分为两期岩浆活动。

A PALEOMAGNETSC STUDY OF XINMINBU FORMATION OF HANXIA SECTION,YUMEN, GANSU

Hanxia Section is situated in the piedmont of the northern slope of the Qilianshan (Nanshan) Mountains, with a distance of some 28km, due west fo Yumen, Gansu Province. The section stretches approximately in a direction of north-sourth. The Mesozoic strata of the section appears as overturned monoclinal strata dipping steeply towards SSW. Dips of the strata are from 60 to 85 degrees. All the strata of the Mesozoic age exposed in the section were previously termed as Xinminbu Formation as a whole. Purely based on the independent data reflected by the plaeomagnetic measurements obtained from 38 samples, 181 specimens, collected from Hanxia Section, a new point about the stratigraphic division of the so-called Xinminbu Formation which was originaly defined as Lower Cretaceous Series is proposed in the present paper. Stratigraphers have paid special attentions to Xinminbu Formation for a long time because of its typicalness and representativeness in continental Mesozoic strata in Northwestern China. However, biostratigraphers have not reached unanimous views on the problem that which geological period of Xinminbu Formation should belong to, up to now. They, therefore, hold different opinions on stratigraphic division of Xinminbu Formation exposed in Hanxia Section. Some of them regard that Xinminbu Formation entirely belongs to the Lower Cretaceous Series, whereas others believe that the lower of it should belong to the Upper Jurassic and the upper of it still represents Lower Cretaceous. Moreover, few hold that Sinminbu Formation belongs to the Upper Jurassic as a whole. Still others deem that we should give it a general name of Jura-Cretaceous. Three characteristic magnetic curves and a magnetic polarity zonation of Hanxia Section have been drawn out on the basis of the data of paleomagnetic measurements of oriented samples gathered from the section (Fig. 1). By means of comparing the magnetic polarity zonation with the world's Mesozoic paleomagnetic polarity stratigraphy and the paleomagnetic polarity scale of oceanic sediments, both 7 normal and 7 reversed polarity subzones have been identified from the results of so-called Xinminbu Formation of this section. Consequently, the writer believes that the Xinminbu Formation of Hanxia Section includes two stratigraphic units belong to different geological times. Taking Serra Geral reversed polarity subzone as a boundary, the Xinminbu Formation of the section can be divided into two parts which in fact belong to two different geological periods respectively. The lower, to a thickness of 459.8m, should be regarded as sediment of Late Jurassic age. The upper is still of Lower Cretaceous Series, being 635.5m thick. The two are of successive sediments. No sedimentary hiatus exists between them. Concretely speaking, the strata beneath the third reversed subzone, corresponding to Serra Geral reversed subzone, should be taken as the Upper Jurassic Series. These Jurassic strata include both all of the normal polarity members belong to Graham normal polarity zone, a thickness of about 344 m, and those belong to the mixed polarity zone, which embrace both 2 normal and 2 reversed subzones, about 116m thick. Therefore, Layer of No.8, the thick-bedded conglomerate with a dark grey colour, is the uppermost layer of Jurassic Series; whereas Layer of No.9, the grey-black paper shale and the grey-green conglomerate, is the lowermost layer of Cretaceous. It is here that the boundary between Jurassic and Cretaceous exposed within Hanxia Section. As for the ages of the basaltic dikes existing in the section, the writer thinks paleomagnetically that the eruption of them should precede the Miocene and postdate the Early Cretaceous. In addition, the eruption consists of two magmatic activities of different times. Besides these, the writer gives out the comparison of the magnetostratigraphic division with the preexisting biostratigraphic division (Fig.2.) The writer does not think it is a good idea for geologists to continuce using such a petrological stratigraphic term, Xinminbu Formatio