Optimized system to improve pumping rate stability during aquifer tests |
| |
Authors: | Young Michael H Rasmussen Todd C Lyons F Comer Pennell Kurt D |
| |
Affiliation: | Division of Hydrologic Sciences, Desert Research Institute, 755 E. Flamingo Rd, Las Vegas, NV 89119;(702) 895–0489;fax (702) 895–0427;. Research performed while at School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, QA 30332–0512;Warnell School of Forest Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602–2152;Department of Public Services and Engineering, Rockdale County, GA 30012;School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332–0512 |
| |
Abstract: | ![]() Aquifer hydraulic properties are commonly estimated using aquifer tests, which are based on an assumption of a uniform and constant pumping rate. Substantial uncertainties in the flow rate across the borehole-formation interface can be induced by dynamic head losses, caused by rapid changes in borehole water levels early in an aquifer test. A system is presented that substantially reduces these sources of uncertainty by explicitly accounting for dynamic head losses. The system which employs commonly available components (including a datalogger, pressure transducers, a variable-speed pump motor, a flow controller, and flowmeters), is inexpensive, highly mobile, and easily set up. It optimizes the flow rate at the borehole-formation interface, making it suitable for any type of aquifer test, including constant, step, or ramped withdrawal and injection, as well as sinusoidal. The system was demonstrated for both withdrawal and injection tests in three aquifers at the Savannah River Site. No modifications to the control system were required, although a small number of characteristics of the pumping and monitoring system were added to the operating program. The pumping system provided a statistically significant, constant flow rate with time. The range in pumping variability (95% confidence interval) was from +/- 2.58 x 10(-4) L/sec to +/- 9.07 x 10(-4) L/sec, across a wide range in field and aquifer conditions. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录! |
|