| 中国区域发展差距格式实证研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 金相郁.中国区域发展差距格式实证研究[J].地域研究与开发,2005,24(1):1-5. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 金相郁 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 南开大学中国城市与区域经济研究中心,天津,300071 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 区域发展差距是客观存在的一种空间现象。对于其格式,目前学术界存在2种观点,就是"Williamson假说"和"Amos假说"。文章在以往中国区域发展差距研究的基础上,利用区域发展差距方程式研究了中国区域发展差距格式。实证分析结果表明,在1952～2000年期间,中国区域发展差距符合"Amos假说"的格式。但是,不同时期呈现不同的特征,在1952～1980年期间,其差距符合"Williamson假说"的格式,并在1980～2000年期间,其差距符合"Amos假说"的格式。
|
| 关 键 词： | 区域 区域发展差距 Williamson假说 Amos假说 |
| 文章编号： | 1003-2363(2005)01-0001-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003年11月28 |
An Empirical Study of Regional Development Disparity Patterns in China |
| |
| JINXiang-yu.An Empirical Study of Regional Development Disparity Patterns in China[J].Areal Research and Development,2005,24(1):1-5. |
| |
| Authors: | JINXiang-yu |
| |
| Abstract: | Regional development disparity is a spatial phenomenon which is objectively existed. For the patterns, there are two theoretical viewpoints, Williamson's hypothesis and Amos's hypothesis. For the China regional development disparity, many empirical studies suggest the different results. In the ground of another research, this paper use regional development disparity equation and analyze the regional development disparity patterns of China. The empirical result of this paper suggests that the patterns are similar with Amos's hypothesis from 1952 to 2000. But the different period presents different characteristics. The patterns are similar with Williamson's hypothesis from 1952 to 1980. The patterns are similar with Amos's hypothesis from 1980 to 2000. |
| |
| Keywords: | region regional development disparity Williamson's hypothesis Amos's hypothesis |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
