首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

遥感土地覆被分类的空间尺度响应研究
引用本文:徐凯健,田庆久,杨闫君,徐念旭.遥感土地覆被分类的空间尺度响应研究[J].地球信息科学,2018,20(2):246-253.
作者姓名:徐凯健  田庆久  杨闫君  徐念旭
作者单位:1. 南京大学国际地球系统科学研究所,南京 2100232. 江苏省地理信息技术重点实验室,南京 210023
基金项目:国家重点研发计划重点专项(2017YFD0600903);国家科技重大专项(03-Y20A04-9001-17/18、30-Y20A29- 9003-15/17)
摘    要:不同空间分辨率遥感影像对区域土地覆被类型识别精度的影响是目前土地资源遥感研究中的热点议题。本文基于准同步的卫星传感器影像,以福建省长汀县河田盆地为研究区,结合野外调查的实验样本,依次采用最大似然法(MLC)、支持向量机(SVM)和人工神经网络(ANN)3种分类器,分析土地覆被分类结果在中高空间尺度序列(1~50 m)下的变化响应特征。结果表明:不同空间尺度下的地物分类结果存在显著差异(P<0.05),其中总分类精度和Kappa系数均随影像分辨率的降低而先升高后降低,并于4 m分辨率处达到峰值,该结果与各类地物光谱反射率的空间尺度变化特征密切相关;而不同分类器对各空间尺度影像分类结果的影响程度差异较大(P<0.05),其中SVM的分类精度最优,MLC次之,ANN的结果较差。此外,伴随影像空间分辨率的降低,不同土地覆被类型面积提取结果的变化规律不同,导致同类地物在不同空间尺度下的提取结果出现较大差异,表明在使用多源分辨率遥感数据进行土地监测等相关研究时,其伴随的结果误差不容忽视。

关 键 词:遥感分类  分类器  高分卫星  空间分辨率  尺度效应  
收稿时间:2017-08-03

Response of Spatial Scale for Land Cover Classification of Remote Sensing
XU Kaijian,TIAN Qingjiu,YANG Yanjun,XU Nianxu.Response of Spatial Scale for Land Cover Classification of Remote Sensing[J].Geo-information Science,2018,20(2):246-253.
Authors:XU Kaijian  TIAN Qingjiu  YANG Yanjun  XU Nianxu
Institution:1. International Institute for Earth System Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China2. Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science and Technology, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
Abstract:Classification based on remote sensing data has been widely applied in land cover mapping and the dynamic change monitoring research, of which the consequence is always strongly affected by spatial resolution of the used images. However, the response of multi-resolution images to remote sensing classification is still highly uncertain. Satellite observation could supply more and more multi-resolution images covering the same area at the same time and it would provide abundant data and technical support for study of remote sensing classification. In this study, the Hetian basin of Changting County in Fujian Province, was selected as a case to examine the performance of three typical classifiers (Maximum Likelihood Classification, MLC; Support Vector Machine, SVM; Artificial Neural Network, ANN). They were applied to satellite observations of temporal quasi-synchronous and multi-spatial resolution from medium to high spatial resolution (1~50 m) and we investigated the links between spatial resolution and remote sensing classification. Then, we also analyzed the spatial scale difference of spectrum reflectance, recognition accuracy and area extraction of five major land types (including arable land, forest land, water area, bare land and construction land) of the data with seven spatial resolution levels of 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 30, and 50 m. They were supported with GF-1 PMS (pan and multi-spectra sensor), GF-2 PMS, GF-1 WFV (wide field view), Landsat-8 OLI (operational land imager) and GF-4 PMS data. 1845 recorded points observed in field survey were taken as training samples and validation samples. The results showed that along with the change of image spatial resolution from 1 to 50 m, (1) the mean spectra of bare land and construction land remained stable and no obvious changes occurred to water body, while the mean spectra of arable land and forest land decreased significantly when image resolution coarser than 4 m. The standard deviations of water body, bare land and construction land all increased constantly, while the standard deviations of arable land and forest land almost maintained stable. (2) The overall accuracy gradually decreased from 94.97±2.5% to 79.03±2.25% across the three classifiers, showing a gradually downward trend. Meanwhile, Kappa coefficient also gradually decreased from 0.93±0.03 to 0.72±0.03, which indicated that the accuracy of land cover classification was closely and sensitively related to the resolution of remote sensing images (P<0.05). (3) The calculation errors of the land types area would become larger as the image tend to be coarser, of which the area of arable land, bare land and construction land decreased significantly, the area of forest land increased, and the change of water body was not evident. The results above confirmed that when using multi-resolution images to generate land cover area or making area comparison refer to time serial data results, the errors from spatial database of various multi-scale could not be neglected, which would be more suitable to make the multi-scale transform for spatial effect correction. Our framework demonstrated the regular pattern of multiscale remote sensing classification and provided the prerequisite for scale conversion of classification products with different resolution in the future.
Keywords:classification  classifier  high-resolution satellite  spatial resolution  scale effect  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《地球信息科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《地球信息科学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号