| 波流信号交叉谱估计方法比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张瑞,类淑河,管长龙,王红.波流信号交叉谱估计方法比较[J].海洋与湖沼,2015,46(4):725-731. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张瑞 类淑河 管长龙 王红 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国海洋大学数学科学学院 青岛 266100,中国海洋大学数学科学学院 青岛 266100;中国海洋大学物理海洋实验室 青岛 266100,中国海洋大学物理海洋实验室 青岛 266100,中国海洋大学数学科学学院 青岛 266100 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学基金项目,41276010号;教育部博士点专项基金项目,20130132130002号。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 本文利用风浪实验数据,采用Welch、MTM、MVDR等方法估计了波面位移和铅直流速的凝聚谱,以期得到适合于波流信号的交叉谱估计方法。数据分析结果表明,三种方法给出的凝聚谱估计在以谱峰频率为中心的较宽频段上基本一致,均高于临界值,表明波流信号在主导波频段上存在显著的相关性;在高频段,MVDR方法估计存在一个类似单谱的指数衰减趋势,而另外两种方法的估计值持续高于临界值。数值模拟结果亦表明MVDR方法有更强的相关信号识别能力和频率分辨能力,且不易出现伪峰,因而估计结果更加可靠。
|
| 关 键 词： | 交叉谱 凝聚谱 波流相关性 Welch 方法 MTM 方法 MVDR 方法 |
| 收稿时间： | 2014/11/17 0:00:00 |
| 修稿时间： | 2015/2/13 0:00:00 |
COMPARISON AMONG METHODS FOR CROSS-SPECTRA ESTIMATION BETWEEN WAVE AND CURRENT |
| |
| ZHANG Rui,LEI Shu-He,GUAN Chang-Long and WANG Hong.COMPARISON AMONG METHODS FOR CROSS-SPECTRA ESTIMATION BETWEEN WAVE AND CURRENT[J].Oceanologia Et Limnologia Sinica,2015,46(4):725-731. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Rui LEI Shu-He GUAN Chang-Long and WANG Hong |
| |
| Institution: | School of Mathematical Science, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China,School of Mathematical Science, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China;Key Laboratory of Physical Oceanography, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China,Key Laboratory of Physical Oceanography, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China and School of Mathematical Science, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China |
| |
| Abstract: | We employed and compared three methods: Welch, MTM, and MVDR, to estimate wave-current cross-spectra, and analyzed three pairs of data of wave and current from our wind-wave experiment.The results show that the magnitude-squared coherence estimated by the three methods is similar in peak frequency, implying that coherence between wave and current in dominant frequency band is significant.In high-frequency band, the estimated magnitude-squared coherence by MVDR method decays as wave spectra and current spectra do, unlike the coherence from the other two methods that stay significant even in very high frequency band.In addition, numerical simulation showed that MVDR method is more capable of distinguishing adjacent cohere frequency without spurious peak, and its result could be more reliable. |
| |
| Keywords: | cross-spectra magnitude-squared coherence wave-current interaction Welch method MTM method MVDR method |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《海洋与湖沼》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《海洋与湖沼》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
