首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Coupled groundwater flow and transport: 1. Verification of variable density flow and transport models
Institution:1. Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR), Stilleweg 2, 30655, Hannover, Germany;2. Leibniz University, Hannover, Institute of Hydrology and Water Resources Management, Appelstr. 9A, 30167, Hannover, Germany;1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States;2. Schlumberger-Doll Research Center, Cambridge, MA, United States;1. Department of Earth Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, China;2. Shenzhen Research Institute, The University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China;3. Center for Agricultural Water Research in China, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100083, China
Abstract:This work examines variable density flow and corresponding solute transport in groundwater systems. Fluid dynamics of salty solutions with significant density variations are of increasing interest in many problems of subsurface hydrology. The mathematical model comprises a set of non-linear, coupled, partial differential equations to be solved for pressure/hydraulic head and mass fraction/concentration of the solute component. The governing equations and underlying assumptions are developed and discussed. The equation of solute mass conservation is formulated in terms of mass fraction and mass concentration. Different levels of the approximation of density variations in the mass balance equations are used for convection problems (e.g. the Boussinesq approximation and its extension, fully density approximation). The impact of these simplifications is studied by use of numerical modelling.Numerical models for nonlinear problems, such as density-driven convection, must be carefully verified in a particular series of tests. Standard benchmarks for proving variable density flow models are the Henry, Elder, and salt dome (HYDROCOIN level 1 case 5) problems. We studied these benchmarks using two finite element simulators - ROCKFLOW, which was developed at the Institute of Fluid Mechanics and Computer Applications in Civil Engineering and FEFLOW, which was developed at the Institute for Water Resources Planning and Systems Research Ltd. Although both simulators are based on the Galerkin finite element method, they differ in many approximation details such as temporal discretization (Crank-Nicolson vs predictor-corrector schemes), spatial discretization (triangular and quadrilateral elements), finite element basis functions (linear, bilinear, biquadratic), iteration schemes (Newton, Picard) and solvers (direct, iterative). The numerical analysis illustrates discretization effects and defects arising from the different levels of the density of approximation. We contribute new results for the salt dome problem, for which inconsistent findings exist in literature. Applications of the verified numerical models to more complex problems, such as thermohaline and three-dimensional convection systems, will be presented in the second part of this paper.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号