首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

考虑松动区内应力分布形式的松动土压力研究
引用本文:徐长节,梁禄钜,陈其志,刘元昆.考虑松动区内应力分布形式的松动土压力研究[J].岩土力学,2018,39(6):1927-1934.
作者姓名:徐长节  梁禄钜  陈其志  刘元昆
作者单位:1. 浙江大学 滨海和城市岩土工程研究中心,浙江 杭州 310058;2. 华东交通大学 土木建筑学院,江西 南昌 330013
基金项目:国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)(No.2015CB057801);国家自然科学基金项目(No.51278449,No.51238009,No.51338009)
摘    要:传统土拱效应理论是基于松动区内土体应力均匀分布这一基本假定建立的,然而由于松动区内部主应力轴偏转的影响,实际情况下松动区内部的土体应力分布往往是非均匀的。针对这一情况,在太沙基松动土压力分析模型的基础上,通过假定3种不同形状的大主应力轨迹线,考虑了松动区内应力分布形式对松动土压力的影响,对传统太沙基松动土压力公式进行了修正,并与离散元数值模拟结果进行了对比验证。研究结果表明:当土体达到极限平衡状态时,松动区内部竖向应力与水平向应力分别呈上凹式分布和上凸式分布,松动区中轴线上侧向土压力系数等于被动土压力系数;采用不同形状的大主应力轨迹线进行计算所得应力分布之间的差异在10%以内,且均与离散元数值模拟结果吻合良好,从而验证了修正解的有效性。为计算方便起见,推荐相关工程中采用圆弧形大主应力轨迹线假定进行计算。

关 键 词:土拱效应  松动区  松动土压力  应力分布  离散元  
收稿时间:2016-11-28

Research on loosening earth pressure considering the patterns of stress distribution in loosening zone
XU Chang-jie,LIANG Lu-ju,CHEN Qi-zhi,LIU Yuan-kun.Research on loosening earth pressure considering the patterns of stress distribution in loosening zone[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2018,39(6):1927-1934.
Authors:XU Chang-jie  LIANG Lu-ju  CHEN Qi-zhi  LIU Yuan-kun
Institution:1. Research Center of Coastal and Urban Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330013, China
Abstract:Traditional theory of soil arching effect is based on the assumption of homogeneous stress distribution in loosening zone. However, because of the influence of main stress axes deflection in loosening zone, the stress distribution is inhomogeneous. Based on Terzaghi’s loosening earth pressure theory, three types of major principal stress path are assumed and then a modified analytical solution of loosening earth pressure is presented considering the influence of stress distribution. DEM is also used to compare the model. The results show that when soils arrive ultimate equilibrium state, the distributions of vertical stress and horizontal stress in loosening zone are concave and convex respectively, and lateral earth pressure coefficient equals to passive earth pressure coefficient on the axle of the loosening zone. Difference among different major principal stress paths is less than 10% and these results are all in agreement with DEM numerical results, which confirms the effectiveness of the modified analytical solution. For the convenience of calculation, it is recommended to assume an arc path of major principal stress in the calculation of relevant projects.
Keywords:soil arching effect  loosening zone  loosening earth pressure  stress distribution  DEM  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《岩土力学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《岩土力学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号