首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

生命周期视角下建成环境对居民休闲体力活动的影响
引用本文:陈菲,周素红,张琳.生命周期视角下建成环境对居民休闲体力活动的影响[J].世界地理研究,2019,28(5):106-117.
作者姓名:陈菲  周素红  张琳
作者单位:中山大学地理科学与规划学院,广州 510275
广东省公共安全与灾害工程技术研究中心,广州 510275
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(41871148);广东省自然科学基金项目(2014A030312010)
摘    要:近年来,建成环境对居民休闲体力活动的影响受到广泛的关注,但这种影响对于生命周期不同阶段居民来说是否存在差异需深入研究。因此,本文基于生命周期理论,将广州市居民划分为无子阶段、满巢阶段Ⅰ、满巢阶段Ⅱ、空巢期四个阶段,利用多元线性回归方程,研究建成环境对生命周期不同阶段居民休闲体力活动影响的差异。研究发现:(1)各阶段居民散步、中等强度、高强度休闲体力活动的频率和时间差异显著,但休闲体力活动水平无明显差异。(2)由于各阶段居民生活方式和休闲行为不同,建成环境对其休闲体力活动水平的影响存在差异。各阶段居民都受到康体设施密度的正向影响。此外,无子阶段居民偏好多样化且中高强度休闲体力活动,因此受POI密度和交叉口密度正向影响较大。满巢阶段Ⅰ与满巢阶段Ⅱ的居民受到家庭束缚较大,受建成环境影响较小。空巢期居民偏好于散步,受土地利用多样性的正向影响较大,土地利用多样性高的地区,空巢期居民出门活动的几率更高。考虑到各阶段人群特征及需求差异,应采取差异化的建成环境改善措施,提供个性化的服务供给。

关 键 词:生命周期  建成环境  休闲体力活动  广州  无子阶段  满巢阶段  空巢阶段  
收稿时间:2018-04-08
修稿时间:2018-10-03

Influence of built environment on residents' leisure time physical activity from the perspective of life cycle
Fei CHEN,Suhong ZHOU,Lin ZHANG.Influence of built environment on residents' leisure time physical activity from the perspective of life cycle[J].World Regional Studies,2019,28(5):106-117.
Authors:Fei CHEN  Suhong ZHOU  Lin ZHANG
Institution:School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
Guangdong Provincial Engineering Research Center for Public Security and Disaster, Guangzhou 510275, China
Abstract:The relationship between built environment and leisure time physical activity(LTPA) is a popular issue in recent years. However, the difference between residents at different stages of Life Cycle needs to be studied. Using multiple linear regression equation, this study compares the difference effects of built environment on the residents' LTPA between different stages of Life Cycle. Firstly, residents in Guangzhou are divided into non-subsidiary stage, Phase I of the full nest stage, Phase II of the full nest and empty-nest period based on the Life Cycle theory. According to the results, there is significant difference in the frequency and time of walking, moderate intensity physical activity and high intensity physical activity, while there is no significant difference on the Mets of LTPA. Secondly, the effects of the built environment on the Mets of LTPA of residents are different. Residents at all stages are positively affected by the density of fitness facilities. Residents at the stage of non-subsidiary prefer to choose diversified leisure physical activities of moderate intensity or high intensity, so the high density of POI and intersections has a positive impact. The residents at the stage of Phase I of the full nest stage and Phase II of the full nest are bound by family life and less affected by the built environment. The residents at the stage of empty-nest prefer to walk, so they are affected more by the differentiated land use patterns. Living in the areas with differentiated land use patterns, the residents at the stage of empty-nest are more likely to go out. Thus, considering the different characteristics and needs of the residents, the distribution of service facilities should be different.
Keywords:life cycle  built environmental  leisure time physical activity  Guangzhou  non-subsidiary stage  Phase I of the full nest stage  Phase II of the full nest  empty-nest period  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《世界地理研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《世界地理研究》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号