TY01和O02两种海面空气动力粗糙度方案的比较

本文采用美国国家浮标站(44008)2003年1～3月的资料，通过COARE算法(版本2．6b)，比较了O02和TY01这两种海面空气动力粗糙度长度的参数化方案。通过对摩擦速度、拖曳系数、海面粗糙度及风应力等物理因子的计算得出：在粗糙的海面上，TY01和O02两种参数化方案的计算结果是比较一致的。在考虑浪的信息方面，TY01和O02都是很好的参数化方案．它们都可以适用于不同的风速条件，适用于各种尺度的海洋及湖泊。但是这两种方案在处理幼波时存在不连续的缺点。并且，对于风速较小的光滑海面，尽管它们计算的结果较一致，但是仍然存在偏差。据此，本文的结果对于理论分析和数值计算如何正确使用上述两种海面空气动力粗糙度参数化方案，可提供必要的参考价值。

A COMPARISON OF TY01 AND O02 SEA SURFACE AERODYNAMIC ROUGHNESS SCHEMES

The data, collected at the American National Data Buoy 44008 from January 1 through March 31, 2003, are used to test sea surface roughness schemes by using the COARE bulk parameterization scheme. The aim of this study is to better understand the sensitively of the buoy-derived surface momentum fluxes to choices of surface roughness parameterization and the range of applicability of the two schemes (TY01 and O02). Because the stability dependence scheme is fixed in our calculation of the surface stress, the differences in the modeled results of surface stress should be caused by different determination of roughness length. Our results show that the similarity between TY01 and O02 for this particularly measurements as a result of strong correlation between the wave steepness and the wave age. We also found that O02 scheme may experience numerical problems in case of extremely young waves while the YT01 scheme frequently resulted in discontinuity in the neutral drag coefficients for young waves.