首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

塔中地区碳酸盐岩与碎屑岩储层物性差异及主控因素
引用本文:沈卫兵,庞雄奇,张宝收,霍志鹏,王贵,王阳洋.塔中地区碳酸盐岩与碎屑岩储层物性差异及主控因素[J].高校地质学报,2015,21(1):138-146.
作者姓名:沈卫兵  庞雄奇  张宝收  霍志鹏  王贵  王阳洋
作者单位:1. 中国石油大学(北京)油气资源与探测国家重点实验室,北京102249;中国石油大学(北京)盆地与油藏研究中心,北京102249
2. 中国石油塔里木油田勘探开发研究院,库尔勒,841000
3. 中海油田服务股份有限公司油田生产事业部,天津,300450
基金项目:国家重点基础研究规划“973”项目
摘    要:通过对塔里木盆地塔中地区55口探井的岩心观察及200多张铸体薄片的鉴定,分析了92口探井的孔渗、岩石压汞及测井解释成果,及其石炭系—志留系碎屑岩储层与奥陶系碳酸盐岩储层之间物性特征的差异,结合地质背景讨论了造成这些差异的主控因素。结果表明研究区碎屑岩储层总体为低孔低渗—中孔中渗,碳酸盐岩储层总体为低孔低渗—特低孔特低渗,两类储层的孔隙度、渗透率和孔喉半径三个物性特征参数之间的相关性完全不同。原始沉积作用是两类储层物性差异形成的基础,宏观上体现在储层沉积相带的不同,微观上体现在储层矿物组分、结构的差异;后期成岩作用,包括压实、溶蚀、胶结及构造裂缝改造是两类储层物性差异形成的关键,相对于碎屑岩储层物性参数大小的改变,碳酸盐岩储层物性受溶蚀、胶结、构造裂缝改造的影响较大,相对而言受压实作用的影响较小。两类储层物性差异主控因素的对比研究表明碎屑岩储层应侧重于优质沉积相带中原生孔隙油气勘探;碳酸盐岩储层应侧重于次生孔隙油气勘探。

关 键 词:储层物性  主控因素分析  碎屑岩储层  碳酸盐岩储层  塔中地区

Physical Properties Differences and Key Controlling Factors of the Clasolite Reservoirs and Carbonate Reservoirs in Tazhong Area
SHEN Weibing,PANG Xiongqi,ZHANG Baoshou,HUO Zhipeng,WANG Gui,WANG Yangyang.Physical Properties Differences and Key Controlling Factors of the Clasolite Reservoirs and Carbonate Reservoirs in Tazhong Area[J].Geological Journal of China Universities,2015,21(1):138-146.
Authors:SHEN Weibing  PANG Xiongqi  ZHANG Baoshou  HUO Zhipeng  WANG Gui  WANG Yangyang
Institution:SHEN Weibing;PANG Xiongqi;ZHANG Baoshou;HUO Zhipeng;WANG Gui;WANG Yangyang;State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum;Basin & Reservoir Research Center,China University of Petroleum;Research Institute of Exploration and Development,Petrochina Tarim Basin;Oilfield Production Division,China Oilfield Services Limited;
Abstract:This paper reports data from observation of 55 wells and identification of more than 200 casting thin sections, mercury injection data analysis and logging interpretation of 92 wells and analyzed physical properties differences between the Silurian- Carboniferous clasolite reservoirs and the Ordovician carbonate reservoirs in the Tazhong area. Key controlling factors for the physical properties differences were discussed based on geological setting. The results showed that the clasolite reservoirs have medium-low porosity and medium-low permeability, and the carbonate reservoirs have lowto ultra-low porosity and lowto ultra-low permeability. The correlations among porosity, permeability and pore-throat radius are totally different for the two different types of reservoirs. The physical properties differences were controlled by sedimentation, which embodies sedimentary facies difference from macroscopic view and minerals composition difference and grain size from microscopic perspective. Besides sedimentation, physical properties differences are mainly controlled by compaction, dissolution, cementation and fracture rebuilding effect. Compared with the variation of physical properties of clasolite reservoirs, the carbonate reservoirs are more likely affected by dissolution, cementation and fracture rebuilding effect, and are more difficultly affected by compaction. Comparative studies of key controlling factors of the physical properties show that clasolite reservoirs should focus on primary pore for petroleum exploration, while carbonate reservoir should on secondary pore.
Keywords:reservoir physical properties  key factor analysis  clasolite reservoirs  carbonate reservoir  Tazhong area
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《高校地质学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《高校地质学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号