首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Landslide susceptibility assessment in the Anfu County,China: comparing different statistical and probabilistic models considering the new topo-hydrological factor (HAND)
Authors:" target="_blank">Haoyuan Hong  Aiding Kornejady  Adel Soltani  Seyed Vahid Razavi Termeh  Junzhi Liu  A-Xing Zhu  Arastoo Yari hesar  Baharin Bin Ahmad  Yi Wang
Institution:1.Key Laboratory of Virtual Geographic Environment (Nanjing Normal University), Ministry of Education,Nanjing,China;2.State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base of Geographical Environment Evolution (Jiangsu Province),Nanjing,China;3.Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographic Information Resource Development and Application,Nanjing,China;4.Young Researchers and Elite Club, Gorgan Branch,Islamic Azad University,Gorgan,Iran;5.Faculty member of the Department of Agricultural Technology & Engineering,Payam Noor University,Tehran,Iran;6.Faculty of Geodesy & Geomatics Engineering,K. N. Toosi University of Technology,Tehran,Iran;7.Department of Geography,University of Mohaghegh Ardabili,Ardabil,Iran;8.Department of Geoinformation, Faculty of Geoinformation and Real Estate,Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM),Skudai,Malaysia;9.Institute of Geophysics and Geomatics,China University of Geosciences,Wuhan,China
Abstract:The present study is aimed at producing landslide susceptibility map of a landslide-prone area (Anfu County, China) by using evidential belief function (EBF), frequency ratio (FR) and Mahalanobis distance (MD) models. To this aim, 302 landslides were mapped based on earlier reports and aerial photographs, as well as, carrying out several field surveys. The landslide inventory was randomly split into a training dataset (70%; 212landslides) for training the models and the remaining (30%; 90 landslides) was cast off for validation purpose. A total of sixteen geo-environmental conditioning factors were considered as inputs to the models: slope degree, slope aspect, plan curvature, profile curvature, the new topo-hydrological factor termed height above the nearest drainage (HAND), average annual rainfall, altitude, distance from rivers, distance from roads, distance from faults, lithology, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), sediment transport index (STI), stream power index (SPI), soil texture, and land use/cover. The validation of susceptibility maps was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). As a results, the FR outperformed other models with an AUROC of 84.98%, followed by EBF (78.63%) and MD (78.50%) models. The percentage of susceptibility classes for each model revealed that MD model managed to build a compendious map focused at highly susceptible areas (high and very high classes) with an overall area of approximately 17%, followed by FR (22.76%) and EBF (31%). The premier model (FR) attested that the five factors mostly influenced the landslide occurrence in the area: NDVI, soil texture, slope degree, altitude, and HAND. Interestingly, HAND could manifest clearer pattern with regard to landslide occurrence compared to other topo-hydrological factors such as SPI, STI, and distance to rivers. Lastly, it can be conceived that the susceptibility of the area to landsliding is more subjected to a complex environmental set of factors rather than anthropological ones (residential areas and distance to roads). This upshot can make a platform for further pragmatic measures regarding hazard-planning actions.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号