MSCT不同组合后处理技术对腹内疝诊断的应用价值 |
| |
引用本文: | 李孟静,霍英杰,宫凤玲,张惠英,徐慧慧,王星稳,马春梅.MSCT不同组合后处理技术对腹内疝诊断的应用价值[J].CT理论与应用研究,2019,28(5):609-615. |
| |
作者姓名: | 李孟静 霍英杰 宫凤玲 张惠英 徐慧慧 王星稳 马春梅 |
| |
作者单位: | 华北理工大学附属医院CT室,河北 唐山,063000;中国石油天然气集团公司中心医院MRI,河北 廊坊,065000 |
| |
摘 要: | 目的:探讨多层螺旋CT(MSCT)的不同组合后处理技术在腹内疝(IAH)诊断中的应用价值。方法:回顾性分析手术证实的63例行腹部增强扫描IAH患者,其中22例为腹内疝伴绞窄性肠梗阻,41例为腹内疝伴非绞窄性肠梗阻,将不同后处理技术进行组合:多平面重组(MPR)+最大密度投影(MIP)组;MPR+曲面重组(CPR)组,根据咖啡豆征/假肿瘤征、鸟嘴征、肠系膜漩涡征/缆绳征、同心圆征等征象,对IAH的定位、定性作出判断,分析结果。结果:十二指肠旁疝3例、Winslow孔疝1例、盲肠周围疝2例、肠粘连束带型腹内疝57例,MPR+MIP组准确率(80.95%),MPR+CPR组准确率(76.19%),两组在IAH类型诊断中无统计学差异(P>0.05);在显示漩涡征/缆绳征及同心圆征结果中,MPR+MIP组(58.73%和26.98%)均高于MPR+CPR组(49.21%和12.70%),两组具有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论:在MPR+MIP组合后处理技术能很好地对IAH作出诊断,因而可在IAH影像诊断中加以推广。
|
关 键 词: | 多层螺旋CT 不同后处理技术 腹内疝 |
收稿时间: | 2019-03-20 |
Application Value of Different Post-processing Techniques of MSCT in Diagnosis of Intra-abdominal Hernia |
| |
Institution: | 1. North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated hospital CT, Tangshan 063000, China;2. CNPC central hospital MRI, Langfang 065000, China |
| |
Abstract: | Objective: To evaluate the application value of multi-slice spiral CT (MSCT) in the diagnosis of internal abdominal hernia (IAH) with different combined post-processing techniques. Method: A retrospective analysis of 63 cases of intra-abdominal hernia with abdominal enhanced scanning, confirmed by the operation, of which 22 were intra-abdominal hernia with strangulated intestinal obstruction, 41 were intra-abdominal hernia with non-strangulated intestinal obstruction, and different post-processing techniques were combined. Results: Multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) +maximum intensity projection (MIP) group and Multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) +curved planar reformation (CPR) group. According to the signs of coffee bean sign/pseudotumor sign, bird's mouth sign, mesenteric whirlpool sign/cable sign, concentric circle sign and so on, making a judgment about the localization and qualitative analysis of abdominal internal hernia and the results were analyzed. Conclusion: 3 cases of parduodenal hernia, 1 case of Winslow's foramen hernia, 2 cases of pericecal hernia, and 57 cases of intra-abdominal hernia of intestinal adhesive band. The accuracy rate of MPR+MIP group and MPR+CPR group are 80.95% and 76.19%, respectly. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in the diagnosis of intra-abdominal hernia (P>0.05).The results of whirlpool sign/cable sign and concentric circle sign were higher in MPR+MIP group (58.73%, 26.98%) than that in MPR+CPR group (49.21%, 12.70%). There was significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). Conclusion: The combined post-processing technique of MPR+MIP can make a diagnosis of IAH better, so it can be widely expanded in the imaging diagnosis of intra-abdominal hernia. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录! |
| 点击此处可从《CT理论与应用研究》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《CT理论与应用研究》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|