A Korean perspective |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, Faculty of Fisheries, 53100 Rize, Turkey;2. Plymouth Marine Laboratory (PML), Prospect Place, The Hoe, PL1 3DH Plymouth, UK;3. National Centre for Earth Observation, PML, Prospect Place, The Hoe, PL1 3DH Plymouth, UK;4. Swansea University, Department of Biosciences, Singleton Park, SA2 8PP Swansea, Wales, UK;1. Departamento de Oceanografia e Pescas da Universidade dos Açores, Centro do IMAR da Universidade dos Açores, Laboratório Associado LARSyS, MARE — Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Rua Prof. Dr. Frederico Machado, n° 4, 9901-862 Horta, Açores, Portugal;2. Estrutura de Missão para a Extensão da Plataforma Continental (EMEPC), Rua Costa Pinto 165, 2770-047 Paço de Arcos, Portugal |
| |
| Abstract: | The adoption of the EEZ in the 1982 UNCLOS represents the culmination of an effort by some parts of the international community to separate “jurisdiction” over the natural resources in offshore waters from the “sovereignty” manifest in the territorial sea. It is clear that the EEZ is a zone that is neither territorial waters nor wholly high-seas. It is also a zone in which competencies are balanced between the need of coastal States to have sufficient authority to exploit and manage their economic resources and the need of all other States to retain high-seas navigation and communications freedoms and uses related to such freedoms. From South Korea's perspective, the EEZ is a sui generic zone in which military and intelligence activities are limited or not allowed without the consent of the coastal State. This is equally applicable in peace and war. Although several States stress that Article 58 of the 1982 UNCLOS permits such activities, increasing EW and IW capabilities may result in reinterpretation of certain provisions of the 1982 UNCLOS. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
