首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Sodic Pyroxene and Sodic Amphibole as Potential Reference Materials for In Situ Lithium Isotope Determinations by SIMS
Authors:Michael AW Marks  Roberta L Rudnick  Thomas Ludwig  Horst Marschall  Thomas Zack  Ralf Halama  William F McDonough  Detlef Rost  Thomas Wenzel  Edward P Vicenzi  Ivan P Savov  Rainer Altherr  Gregor Markl
Institution:1. Institut für Geowissenschaften, AB Mineralogie und Geodynamik, Eberhard‐Karls‐Universit?t, Wilhelmstra?e 56, 72074 Tübingen, Germany;2. Geochemistry Laboratory, Department of Geology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA;3. Mineralogisches Institut, Ruprecht‐Karls‐Universit?t, Im Neuenheimer Feld 236, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;4. Department of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Wills Memorial Building, Queen's Road, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UK;5. Department of Mineral Sciences, Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, 10th St. and Constitution Ave., Washington, DC 20560‐0119, USA;6. School of Earth and Environments, Leeds University, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
Abstract:Two large pegmatitic crystals of sodic pyroxene (aegirine) and sodic amphibole (arfvedsonite) from the agpaitic igneous Ilímaussaq Complex, south Greenland were found to be suitable as reference materials for in situ Li isotope determinations. Lithium concentrations determined by SIMS and micro‐drilled material analysed by MC‐ICP‐MS generally agreed within analytical uncertainty. The arfvedsonite crystal was homogeneous with Li] = 639 ± 51 μg g?1 (2s, n = 69, MC‐ICP‐MS and SIMS results). The aegirine crystal shows strongly developed sector zoning, which is a common feature of aegirines. Using qualitative element mapping techniques (EPMA), the homogeneous core of the crystal was easily distinguished from the outermost sectors of the crystals. The core had a mean Li] of 47.6 ± 3.6 μg g?1 (2s, n = 33) as determined by SIMS. The seven micro‐drilled regions measured by solution MC‐ICP‐MS returned slightly lower concentrations (41–46 μg g?1), but still overlap with the SIMS data within uncertainty. Based on MC‐ICP‐MS and SIMS analyses, the variation in δ7Li was about 1‰ in each of the two crystals, which is smaller than that in widely used glass reference materials, making these two samples suitable to serve as reference materials. There was, however, a significant offset between the results of MC‐ICP‐MS and SIMS. The latter deviated from the MC‐ICP‐MS results by ?6.0 ± 1.9‰ (2s) for the amphibole and by ?3.9 ± 1.9‰ (2s) for the aegirine. This indicates the presence of a significant matrix effect in SIMS determinations of Li isotopes for amphibole and pyroxene relative to the basalt glasses used for calibration. Based on the MC‐ICP‐MS results, mean δ7Li values of +0.7 ± 1.2‰ (2s, n = 10) for the arfvedsonite crystal and of ?3.7 ± 1.2‰ (2s, n = 7) for the core of the aegirine crystal were calculated. Adopting these values, SIMS users can correct for the specific IMF (instrumental mass fractionation) of the ion probe used. We propose that these two crystals serve as reference materials for in situ Li isotope determinations by SIMS and pieces of these two crystals are available from the first author upon request.
Keywords:reference material  Li isotopes  aegirine  arfvedsonite  Ilí  maussaq  maté  riau de ré    rence  isotopes de Li  aegé  rine  arfvedsonite  Ilí  maussaq
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号