Some remarks on the Gaussian beam summation method |
| |
Authors: | B. S. White A. Norris A. Bayliss R. Burridge |
| |
Affiliation: | Exxon Research and Engineering Company, Corporate Research Science Laboratories, Clinton Township, Route 22 East, Annandale, New Jersey 08801, USA;Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University, NY 10012, USA;Rutgers University, Department of Mechanics and Materials Science, PO Box 909, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Summary. Recently, a method using superposition of Gaussian beams has been proposed for the solution of high-frequency wave problems. The method is a potentially useful approach when the more usual techniques of ray theory fail: it gives answers which are finite at caustics, computes a nonzero field in shadow zones, and exhibits critical angle phenomena, including head waves. Subsequent tests by several authors have been encouraging, although some reported solutions show an unexplained dependence on the 'free' complex parameter ε which specifies the initial widths and phases of the Gaussian beams. We use methods of uniform asymptotic expansions to explain the behaviour of the Gaussian beam method. We show how it computes correctly the entire caustic boundary layer of a caustic of arbitrary complexity, and computes correctly in a region of critical reflection. However, the beam solution for head waves and in edge-diffracted shadow zones are shown to have the correct asymptotic form, but with governing parameters that are explicitly ε-dependent. We also explain the mechanism by which the beam solution degrades when there are strong lateral inhomogeneities. We compare numerically our predictions for some representative, model problems, with exact solutions obtained by other means. |
| |
Keywords: | ray theory caustics diffraction head waves |
|
|