首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

腾格里沙漠东南缘不同年代固沙区根系分布
引用本文:陈永乐,张志山,吴攀,回嵘,虎瑞,高艳红.腾格里沙漠东南缘不同年代固沙区根系分布[J].中国沙漠,2013,33(2):515-521.
作者姓名:陈永乐  张志山  吴攀  回嵘  虎瑞  高艳红
作者单位:1. 中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所沙坡头沙漠试验研究站,甘肃兰州730000;中国科学院研究生院,北京100049
2. 中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所沙坡头沙漠试验研究站,甘肃兰州,730000
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目,中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所青年人才成长基金项目
摘    要:2010年8月,选择腾格里沙漠东南缘1964年、1981年和1990年建立的人工固沙区为对象,以流动沙丘和邻近的天然植被区为对照,利用根钻取样法研究了不同年代固沙植被区根系的3.0m剖面的分布特征.结果表明:单位土地面积上<1 mm的活根、全部活根、<1 mm的死根和全部死根的重量密度和长度密度在不同样地间存在着显著差异(p<0.05);流沙、1990年、1981年、1964年固沙区和天然植被区全部活根重量密度分别为2.9±2.2、164.7±46.5、461.3±83.6、440.4±81.8g.m-2和350.0±132.5 g·m-2,5个样地全部死根重量密度分别为4.9±2.8、58.7±15.8、390.9±57.9、492.5±252.2 g·m-2和214.4±29.9 g.m-2;根长密度也表现为相似的变化趋势.单位土壤体积的根系重量密度和长度密度随着土层加深而递减,植被区0~1.0 m土壤层活根的累积重量密度和长度密度在全部活根中的比例均超过70.0%,其中以天然植被区最大,流沙区则不超过25%;死根也表现为相似的趋势,只是比例有所降低.根鞘占全部根系生物量的比例非常不稳定,流沙区的最大,为94.3%,而1981年植被区的只有0.5%,1964年、1990年固沙区和天然植被区分别为29.9%,70.3%和58.9%.

关 键 词:固沙植被  细根  活根  死根  分布

Root Distribution of Sand-Binding Vegetation in the Southeastern Tengger Desert, China
CHEN Yong-le,ZHANG Zhi-shan,WU Pan,HUI Rong,HU Rui,GAO Yan-hong.Root Distribution of Sand-Binding Vegetation in the Southeastern Tengger Desert, China[J].Journal of Desert Research,2013,33(2):515-521.
Authors:CHEN Yong-le    ZHANG Zhi-shan  WU Pan    HUI Rong  HU Rui  GAO Yan-hong
Institution:1.Shapotou Desert Research and Experiment Station, Cold and Arid Regions Enviromental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China;
2.Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Abstract:The main objective of the present study was to assess the root system distribution in 0-3.0 m profile at revegetated areas established in 1964, 1981 and 1990 at the southeastern edge of the Tengger Desert, respectively. The experiment was conducted in August, 2010. We chose moving sand dune and the nearby natural vegetation area as control. Soil core was used for collecting roots. Significant difference were found in root weight density and root length density of total live roots, live fine roots (<1 mm), total dead roots and dead fine roots (<1 mm) per unit land area (m2) between different vegetation areas. The root weight density and root length density of total live roots in moving sand area, the revegetated areas that were established in 1990, 1981, 1964 and natural vegetation area were 2.9±2.2, 164.7±46.5, 461.3±83.6, 440.4±81.8 g·m-2 and 350.0±132.5 g·m-2, respectively. Meanwhile, the root weight density and root length density of total dead roots were 4.9±2.8, 58.7±16.8, 390.9±57.9, 492.5±252.2  g·m-2 and 214.4±29.9 g·m-2, respectively. The root length density showed the similar tendencies. The root weight density and root length density per unit soil volume (m3) decreased with soil depths. Proportion of accumulated weight density and length density of live roots and live fine roots (<1 mm) in 0-1.0 m soil layer to the total live roots exceeded 70.0% in vegetation areas. The maximum proportion appeared in the natural vegetation area, while the smallest proportion was in the moving sand area with a value less than 25%. Similar trend has also been observed in the proportion of dead roots, however, the proportion slightly decreased. Proportion of rhizosheath to the total root biomass was instable. The maximum value was 94.3% in the moving sand area and minimum value was only 0.527% in the revegetated area established in 1981. The values in the revegetated areas established in 1964 and 1990 and the natural vegetation area were 29.9%, 70.3% and 58.9%, respectively.
Keywords:sand-binding vegetation  fine root  live root  dead root  distribution
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国沙漠》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国沙漠》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号