首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


VSP traveltime inversion for anisotropy in a buried layer
Authors:Michael A Slawinski  Michael P Lamoureux  Raphael A Slawinski  R James Brown
Institution:Department of Earth Sciences, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Alexander Murray Building, St John's, NF A1B 3X5,;Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4,and;Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada
Abstract:We present a method for calculating the anisotropy parameter of a buried layer by inverting the total traveltimes of direct arrivals travelling from a surface source to a well‐bore receiver in a vertical seismic profiling (VSP) geometry. The method assumes two‐dimensional media. The medium above the layer of interest (and separated from it by a horizontal interface) can exhibit both anisotropy and inhomogeneity. Both the depth of the interface as well as the velocity field of the overburden are assumed to be known. We assume the layer of interest to be homogeneous and elliptically anisotropic, with the anisotropy described by a single parameter χ. We solve the function describing the traveltime between source and receiver explicitly for χ. The solution is expressed in terms of known quantities, such as the source and receiver locations, and in terms of quantities expressed as functions of the single argument xr, which is the horizontal coordinate of the refraction point on the interface. In view of Fermat's principle, the measured traveltime T possesses a stationary value or, considering direct arrivals, a minimum value, inline image. This gives rise to a key result ‐‐ the condition that the actual anisotropy parameter inline image. Owing to the explicit expression inline image, this result allows a direct calculation of inline image in the layer of interest. We perform an error analysis and show this inverse method to be stable. In particular, for horizontally layered media, a traveltime error of one millisecond results in a typical error of about 20% in the anisotropy parameter. This is almost one order of magnitude less than the error inherent in the slowness method, which uses a similar set of experimental data. We conclude by detailing possible extensions to non‐elliptical anisotropy and a non‐planar interface.
Keywords:
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号