首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Landscape-scale analysis of ecosystem risk and returns: A new tool for ICZM
Authors:Jeremy Hills  Margaret Carlisle  Martin Le Tissier  David Muir  Caroline Robinson  
Institution:aEnvision, 9 Stephenson House, Horsley Business Centre, Horsley, NE15 0NY, UK;bAberdeen Institute for Coastal Sciences and Management (AICSM), University of Aberdeen, St Mary's, Kings College, Aberdeen, UK;cComhairle nan Eilan Siar, ICZM Officer, Outer Hebrides Council, Benbecula, Outer Hebrides, UK;dSchool of Marine Science & Technology, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle, NE1 7RU, UK
Abstract:Management of the coastal zone often focuses on “islands” of high value ecosystems, in terms of economic value or conservation. However, integrated management requires landscape-level analysis of all ecosystem values. The biodiversity portfolio analysis (BPA) method is derived from the logic used in share (equity) portfolio management in terms of balancing within a portfolio the returns with the risks. Optimising the returns from a share portfolio, or a suite of ecosystems in a landscape, is dependent on the relationship between the units in terms of risk and return. Three case studies are then presented to test the applicability of the BPA method at the international (North West Europe), regional (Durham Heritage Coast, UK) and local (part of South Uist, Outer Hebrides, UK) spatial scale. The Biodiversity Portfolio Analysis for NW Europe showed that risk and return were highly correlated in the studied Member States. The ranking of risk and return, with the highest first, was Ireland > UK > France=Netherlands > Belgium. For these Member States the risks to ecosystem service provision were positively correlated with GNI (r=0.97, P<0.01); suggesting that the higher the economic importance of coastal and marine resources in a Member State the more at risk the resources are. The regional and local case studies were more focussed on providing information on which to base Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) decision making; both case studies used stakeholder participation to determine risks and returns. The conclusions from these two case studies show how the BPA method can be useful in terms of setting ICZM priorities and in addressing local coastal issues. The BPA involves making a number of assumptions, however, it does provide coastal managers with a potential tool to strategically plan due to increased awareness of the interaction between the ecosystems in the portfolio.There is a need for such techniques, which involve stakeholder participation and which create objective outcomes, to support the implementation of ICZM.
Keywords:Integrated Coastal Zone Management  Coastal management  Environmental economics  Stakeholders
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号