首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

急倾斜多煤层勘查区煤层层位测井曲线对比研究
引用本文:孙少平,常东,高占华,张景考. 急倾斜多煤层勘查区煤层层位测井曲线对比研究[J]. 中国煤炭地质, 2011, 0(6): 56-58,77
作者姓名:孙少平  常东  高占华  张景考
作者单位:[1]河南省煤田地质局,河南郑州450046 [2]新疆地矿局第九地质大队,新疆乌鲁木齐830000 [3]山东省煤田地质局,山东泰安271000
摘    要:急倾斜地层,特别是多煤层的急倾斜地层勘查区,由于地层倾角的变化较大,单纯依靠钻孔取心进行煤层层位对比或利用地震时间剖面同相轴进行煤层层位追踪,效果均不理想。以新疆尼勒克煤田胡吉尔台勘查区为例,在钻探施工方法各异的情况下,通过对各种勘探方法的比较,最终选择误差影响因素较小的自然伽马测井曲线进行煤层层位对比,并找出了该区煤单层、煤层组合及煤岩层组合等自然伽马测井曲线响应特征,如11煤的"上凹下峰"形态,7煤层与9煤层的"手套"形态,16、17、18煤的尖峰与直立组合形态等。根据上述标志层的典型响应特征,采用先走向后倾向的原则,对全区进行煤岩层对比,揭示了该勘查区煤层的分岔、合并、冲刷、沉缺、煤层厚度等变化规律,取得了良好的对比效果。

关 键 词:急倾斜多煤层  层位  测井曲线  对比  新疆尼勒克煤田

Study on Coal Seam Horizon Logging Trace Correlation in Steeply Dipping, Multiple Coal Seam Exploration Area
Sun Shaoping,Chang Dong,Gao Zhanhua and Zhang Jingkao. Study on Coal Seam Horizon Logging Trace Correlation in Steeply Dipping, Multiple Coal Seam Exploration Area[J]. Coal Geology of China, 2011, 0(6): 56-58,77
Authors:Sun Shaoping  Chang Dong  Gao Zhanhua  Zhang Jingkao
Affiliation:1. Henan Bureau of Coal Geological Exploration, Zhengzhou, Henan 450046; 2. The Ninth Geological Team, Xinjiang Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830000; 3. Shandong Bureau of Coal Geological Exploration, Taian, Shandong 271000)
Abstract:Since significant changes of strata dip angles in steeply dipping plus multiple coal seam exploration area, simply relying on drilling core coal seam horizon correlation or using seismic time section lineups carrying out tlorizon tracing will all have no ideal effects. Taking the Hujirtay exploration area, Nilka coalfield, Xinjiang as an example, under situations of different drilling operational methods, after comparison of various exploration methods, finally the natural gamma logging trace with lesser error impacting factors has been selected to carry out coal seam horizon correlation, find out natural gamma logging trace responding features of single coal seam, coal group and coal rock group, such as "concave upper and peak lower" configuration of No.ll coal seam, "glove" configuration of Nos.7 and 9 coal seams, "pinnacle and erect combination" configuration of Nos.16, 17 and 18 coal seams. Based on above typical responding characteristics of key beds, using a principle of strike first, dip second, to carry out coal and rock correlation in whole area, successfully reveals variation pattern of coal seam splitting, merging, scouring, absence and coal thickness, have obtained good correlation results.
Keywords:steeply dipping multiple coal seams  horizon  logging trace  correlation  Nilka coalfield, Xinjiang
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
相似文献(共19条):
[1]、测井在西庙勘查区煤层对比中的应用研究[J].中国煤炭地质
[2]、苏时才 王海清.利用测井曲线进行煤层对比及聚煤规律研究[J].煤田地质与勘探,1995,23(6):55-58.
[3]、王开来,王琛,刘付光.测井曲线在杭东勘查区煤炭普查煤岩层对比中的应用[J].中国煤炭地质,2013(12):68-71.
[4]、臧贵山.浅析掩盖区急倾斜煤层地质勘探的钻孔布置[J].煤田地质与勘探,1989,17(3):35-36.
[5]、霍全明 刘家瑾.用测井曲线识别地质标志层位[J].煤田地质与勘探,1992,20(1):50-55.
[6]、石彦强,邢立杰,薛鲜群.东胜煤田锡尼布拉格勘查区煤层对比[J].中国煤炭地质,2012(8):16-22.
[7]、王海,杨朝晖,李文强,王汉斌.急倾斜多煤层开采岩层移动及地表变形数值模拟研究[J].中国煤炭地质,2022(12):62-67+80.
[8]、潘博文,郭智奇,冯晅,张艳,刘财,杨庆节,卢勇旭,迟唤昭.倾斜层位偏移规律研究[J].世界地质,2013,32(2):384-395.
[9]、聂浩刚,董福辰,赵维宽.东胜煤田阿不亥勘查区侏罗系主要煤层对比研究[J].西北地质,2011,44(1):136-143.
[10]、徐州大黄山矿区急倾斜煤层采空区地基稳定性研究[J].中国煤炭地质
[11]、吴艳,贾建称,杜志强.煤炭地质勘查中煤层综合对比方法研究——以永陇矿区老爷岭普查区为例[J].中国煤炭地质,2012(2):6-10.
[12]、栾安辉潘语录,田贵发.利用井径资料预测鱼卡煤田东部勘探区七煤顶板的稳定性[J].中国煤田地质,2007,19(6):73-75.
[13]、李宝华.松达煤田煤岩层的物性特征及测井曲线对比[J].中国煤炭地质,2009(1):62-64.
[14]、王佟,彭正奇.阿富汗科里奇-阿什普什塔勘查区煤层煤质特征研究[J].中国煤炭地质,2012(2):11-14,25.
[15]、罗忠文.金沙龙凤煤矿测井曲线特征及其在煤岩层对比中的应用[J].中国煤炭地质,2009(5):75-77.
[16]、田维江.贵州省岔河勘探区主采煤层瓦斯压力分析[J].中国煤炭地质,2008,20(4):42-43.
[17]、梁永平,;魏迎春.王洼煤矿扩大延伸勘探区煤质特征[J].中国煤炭地质,2008(7):25-27.
[18]、卢玲玲,秦勇,郭晨.黔西补作勘查区现代地温场及煤层受热温度分析[J].中国煤炭地质,2013(10):12-17.
[19]、王德祖.华亭矿区5号煤层煤相研究[J].中国煤田地质,2005,17(4):6-8,70.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号