首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Quantifying sources of uncertainty in projected wheat yield changes under climate change in eastern Australia
Authors:Bin Wang  De Li Liu  Cathy Waters  Qiang Yu
Institution:1.NSW Department of Primary Industries,Wagga Wagga Agricultural Institute,Wagga Wagga,Australia;2.Climate Change Research Centre and ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate Extremes,University of New South Wales,Sydney,Australia;3.NSW Department of Primary Industries,Orange Agricultural Institute,Orange,Australia;4.School of Life Sciences, Faculty of Science,University of Technology Sydney,Sydney,Australia;5.State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau,Northwest A&F University,Yangling,China;6.College of Resources and Environment,University of Chinese Academy of Science,Beijing,China
Abstract:Future climate projections and impact analyses are pivotal to evaluate the potential change in crop yield under climate change. Impact assessment of climate change is also essential to prepare and implement adaptation measures for farmers and policymakers. However, there are uncertainties associated with climate change impact assessment when combining crop models and climate models under different emission scenarios. This study quantifies the various sources of uncertainty associated with future climate change effects on wheat productivity at six representative sites covering dry and wet environments in Australia based on 12 soil types and 12 nitrogen application rates using one crop model driven by 28 global climate models (GCMs) under two representative concentration pathways (RCPs) at near future period 2021–2060 and far future period 2061–2100. We used the analysis of variance (ANOVA) to quantify the sources of uncertainty in wheat yield change. Our results indicated that GCM uncertainty largely dominated over RCPs, nitrogen rates, and soils for the projections of wheat yield at drier locations. However, at wetter sites, the largest share of uncertainty was nitrogen, followed by GCMs, soils, and RCPs. In addition, the soil types at two northern sites in the study area had greater effects on yield change uncertainty probably due to the interaction effect of seasonal rainfall and soil water storage capacity. We concluded that the relative contributions of different uncertainty sources are dependent on climatic location. Understanding the share of uncertainty in climate impact assessment is important for model choice and will provide a basis for producing more reliable impact assessment.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号