首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

铜矿床勘查工程间距探讨
引用本文:周旭林,傅群和,王宏宇,秦雅静.铜矿床勘查工程间距探讨[J].地质论评,2018,64(4):885-894.
作者姓名:周旭林  傅群和  王宏宇  秦雅静
作者单位:湖南省国土资源规划院;湖南省矿产资源储量评审中心
基金项目:本文为国家矿产资源储量技术标准体系建设项目子课题——重要有色金属与贵金属及稀土稀有矿床合勘查程度研究(编号:CB2015-2-5)
摘    要:为了合理确定铜矿床勘查控制程度,为铜矿床勘查规范修订提供依据,作者收集了大量铜矿床勘查开发资料,开展探采对比研究。通过探采对比认为,现行《铜、铅、锌、银、镍、钼矿地质勘查规范》(DZ/T 0214-2002)确定的铜矿床勘查工程间距偏稀,需要适当调整,建议铜矿床第Ⅰ类型控制的勘查工程间距不变,第Ⅱ类型控制的勘查工程间距调整为80~100 m×60~100 m,第Ⅲ类型控制的勘查工程间距调整为40~60 m×40~60 m,小型铜矿床勘查类型均确定为第Ⅲ类型。

关 键 词:铜矿床  勘查类型  工程间距  探采对比

Discussing on Copper Deposit Exploration Engineering Spacing
ZHOU Xulin,FU Qunhe,WANG Hongyu and QIN Yajing.Discussing on Copper Deposit Exploration Engineering Spacing[J].Geological Review,2018,64(4):885-894.
Authors:ZHOU Xulin  FU Qunhe  WANG Hongyu and QIN Yajing
Abstract:Objectives: In order to reasonably determine the control degree of the exploration of copper deposits and provide a basis for the revision of the specifications for copper mineral exploration, the author have collected a large number of exploration and development data of copper deposits and conducted a comparative study on exploration and mining.Methods: Contrastive analysis of prospection and exploitation.Results: The copper deposit exploration engineering spacing slants spare in the current specifications for copper, lead, zinc, silver, nickeland molybdenum miaeral exploration(DZ/T 0214 2002),it need appropriate adjustments.Conclusions:We suggest that the exploration engineering spacing of the first type remain unchanged; the exploration engineering spacing of the second type is adjusted for 80~100m×60~100m, the exploration engineering spacing of the third type is adjusted for 40~ 60 m×40~60 m, the small copper deposit exploration types were identified as the third type.
Keywords:copper deposit  exploration type  exploration engineering spacing  contrastive analysis of prospection and exploitation
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《地质论评》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《地质论评》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号