首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

泾县、淮北地震台SS-Y型铟瓦伸缩仪洞体应变观测对比
引用本文:严吉,樊冬,鲍子文,李章,程文坤,陶方宇.泾县、淮北地震台SS-Y型铟瓦伸缩仪洞体应变观测对比[J].地震地磁观测与研究,2019,40(3):100-106.
作者姓名:严吉  樊冬  鲍子文  李章  程文坤  陶方宇
作者单位:中国安徽 242500 泾县地震台;中国安徽 235000 淮北地震台;中国合肥 230031 安徽省地震局;中国安徽 237000 金寨地震台
基金项目:安徽省地震局"场带站"科研专项;安徽省地震局科研合同制项目(项目编号:201816)
摘    要:选取泾县、淮北地震台SS-Y型铟瓦伸缩仪2017年度观测资料,从观测环境、观测资料内在质量、降水、气压因素影响差异等方面,对比2个台站洞体应变观测的异同点,并分析观测资料质量出现差异的可能原因。结果显示,淮北地震台形变观测山洞的基础条件和观测资料内在质量全面优于泾县地震台。

关 键 词:洞体应变观测  SS-Y仪  M2波潮汐因子  气象因素  小波分解

Comparison of body strain observation of SS-Y tensometer between Jingxian and Huaibei seismic stations
Yan Ji,Fan Dong,Bao Ziwen,Li Zhang,Cheng Wenkun,Tao Fangyu.Comparison of body strain observation of SS-Y tensometer between Jingxian and Huaibei seismic stations[J].Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research,2019,40(3):100-106.
Authors:Yan Ji  Fan Dong  Bao Ziwen  Li Zhang  Cheng Wenkun  Tao Fangyu
Institution:1.Jingxian Seismic Staion, Anhui Province 242500, China;2.Huaibei Seismic Staion, Anhui Province 235000, China;3.Anhui Earthquake Agency, Hefei 230031, China;4.Jinzhai Seismic Staion, Anhui Province 237000, China
Abstract:In this paper, we analyze and compare the crustal strain observations of SS-Y tensometers between Jingxian and Huaibei seismic stations including the general situation of observation cave, data quality, rainfall disturbance and air pressure disturbance in 2017. It is shown that the observation situation and data quality of Huaibei Seismic Station is better than that of Jingxian Seismic Station.
Keywords:crustal strain observation in horizontal tunnel  SS-Y tensometer  M2-wave tide factor  meteorologic factor  wavelet decomposition
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《地震地磁观测与研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《地震地磁观测与研究》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号