Preliminary Characterisation of New Reference Materials for Microanalysis: Chinese Geological Standard Glasses CGSG‐1, CGSG‐2, CGSG‐4 and CGSG‐5 |
| |
Authors: | Ming‐Yue Hu Xing‐Tao Fan Brigitte Stoll Dmitry Kuzmin Ying Liu Yongsheng Liu Weidong Sun Guang Wang Xiu‐Chun Zhan Klaus Peter Jochum |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Max‐Planck‐Institut für Chemie, Postfach 3060, 55020 Mainz, Germany;2. National Research Center for Geoanalysis, Beijing 100037, China;3. National Research Center for Geoanalysis, Beijing 100037, China;4. Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia;5. CAS Key Laboratory of Isotope Geochronology and Geochemistry, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 1131, Guangzhou 510640, China;6. State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China |
| |
Abstract: | Four silicate glasses were prepared by the fusion of about 1 kg powder each of a basalt, syenite, soil and andesite to provide reference materials of natural composition for microanalytical work. These glasses are referred to as ‘Chinese Geological Standard Glasses’ (CGSG) ‐1, ‐2, ‐4 and ‐5. Micro and bulk analyses indicated that the glasses are well homogenised with respect to major and trace elements. Some siderophile/chalcophile elements (e.g., Sn, Pt, Pb) may be heterogeneously distributed in CGSG‐5. This paper provides the first analytical data for the CGSG reference glasses using a variety of analytical techniques (wet chemistry, XRF, EPMA, ICP‐AES, ICP‐MS, LA‐ICP‐MS) performed in nine laboratories. Most data agree within uncertainty limits of the analytical techniques used. Discrepancies in the data for some siderophile/chalcophile elements exist, mainly because of possible heterogeneities of these elements in the glasses and/or analytical problems. From the analytical data, preliminary reference and information values for fifty‐five elements were calculated. The analytical uncertainties [2 relative standard error (RSE)] were estimated to be between about 1% and 20%. |
| |
Keywords: | CGSG‐1 – 5 MPI‐DING reference glasses reference values homogeneity major element composition trace element composition CGSG‐1 – 5 MPI‐DING verres de ré fé rence valeurs de ré fé rence homogé né ité composition en é lé ments majeurs composition en é lé ments traces |
|
|